Posted on 03/10/2012 9:24:30 AM PST by OUTKAST
They knew from day one. Remember when he was "detained" by them when he was a senator and immediately after the election Putin laughed about what a putz he was.
You know the Russians have a nice, thick file on Obummer .... the one I’d REALLY like to see is Mossad’s.
Arizona sheriff finds Obama presidential qualifications forged
posted last week by the Author/freeper. The article is well researched.
Drudge has been one of the few covering this.
Birthers have convinced themselves that this anti-America, anti-capitalist rag is the only truthful media source, simply because it's the only one that will listen to their deranged ramblings.
Pravda prints more truth than the US MSM. Pravda means “Truth”, oddly enough.
Yes. You would think a Freeper would think twice before driving traffic there.
The investigation of the One you love continues, idiot.
Yes, but now Obama is in a position to inflict tremendous collateral damage on the Rodina as he pushes America off the cliff.
Breitbard left Drudge and one reason was Drudge’s censorship. Drudge is pro-homo (duh) and pro-Romney.
” You would think a Freeper would think twice before driving traffic there.”
Well,,,, that may well have been the only place that would publish the article???
PING!
I would rather post it on my blog and promote it through social media than publish it on an evil publication that is intent on damaging America.
I agree. Pravda, today, is not Stalin's Pravda. Russia has moved sharply to the right--even taking Jefferson's advice & teaching religious values in school. (Yes, boys & girls, the ACLU has been lying to you about what religious freedom & the First Amendment was supposed to mean.)
William Flax
Now I want you to make utterly no change to my pinglist status, or I will report you to admin.
It's an anti-American tabloid. Don't mistake criticism of Obama with an ideological move to the right. They attacked Bush even worse, as they would any American President.
I would rather post it on my blog and promote it through social media than publish it on an evil publication that is intent on damaging America.
So that leaves out CNN MSNBC ABC CBS New York Times, etc who are hell bent on destroying America.
It’s been evident for quite a while Drudge is at very least quite comfortable with the Hollywood / entertainment / gay scene.
Living in SoCal one doesn’t let that be a show-stopper or one would simply stop dealing with anyone.
However this is the first I’d heard that Breitbart left Drudge over some sort of disagreement. I’ve been a fan of Drudge for a long time. Listened to his show even when he was on Sunday nights, and there seemed to be a huge overlap with Drudge and Breitbart.
Any source for the idea Breitbart turned away from that relationship (if you will pardon the phrase, which in Breitbart’s case would not seem to mean more that that)?
I’ve always considered Drudge and Breitbart part of the same whole.
She’s also a Freeper. This is about the biggest story, and biggest political fraud, in our history. It reveals a nation divided to a point not seen since the mid-19th century. And what can only be described as an active media coverup.
So I’m going to ignore this story and take a shower. Let me know if anything else happens.
My first article to make the Drudge Report......
woah.
..The short answer to that is simple. Exposure.
It is impossibly difficult to publish an article at the New York Times, or the Washington times if you are not some sort of personality. Not to mention the fact that US publications in general are deliberately not reporting on it.
Publishing at Pravda allowed me the ability to get the information into the public realm on an international level
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.