Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sean Hannity is an a$$
Vanity | Me - nesnah

Posted on 01/31/2012 1:46:56 PM PST by nesnah

OK, so I am sitting here listening to Sean Hannity and he is speaking with Marco Rubio. The conversation is moving along - no real hard issues discussed other than the Romney platitudes. Then Seah launches into this "have you been hearing about these nutty birthers" crappola. Rubio responds, or non-responds, only to say he is eligible to be a US Senator and just demures the rest.

Hannity sounded like a complete Democrook tool in his demeanor. Birther are nuts, etc. Yo, ummm, Sean, it isn't about birth certificates; it's about eligibility. Hey, Sean, do you know what a natural-born citizen is? Have you bothered to educate yourself?

You know, Sean, you are doing as much to subvert the US Constitution than your brother Barack Obama. I am turning you off for good.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: birftards; birthers; hannity; naturalborncitizen; seanhannity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: BfloGuy
Now that's funny! You reply to #74 and yet my question was at #72 and goes unanswered.
Was my question just too tough or is there simply no 'ready' answer?
81 posted on 01/31/2012 5:33:11 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

Michael Berry is the most listenable host on talk radio. I wish he was on in place of Hannity here in Dallas, but he’s not so I do that old podcast thingy.

Limbaugh - definitely lost something in the last few years.
Hannity - Limbaugh’s parrot.
Levin - I love the guy but he gets under my skin sometimes.
Ingraham - can barely stand to listen to her for last few years.

Michael Berry, he always makes me laugh.


82 posted on 01/31/2012 5:35:05 PM PST by West Texas Chuck (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. That should be a convenience store, not a Government Agency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

If I read correctly, the argument is that Rubio fits the ‘concept’ for NBC of parents or child having relinquished allegiance to a foreign government i.e. Cuba. The parents by intent (I believe both parents were not yet naturalized at time of Rubio’s birth ) and Rubio by birth ( I’m taking that Rubio was born on USA soil). The matter of ‘concept’ is certainly valid for discussing the considerations of the Founding Fathers. There is much in the records since that time with some court records. My personal belief is that the ‘concept of allegiance’ was intended by the Founders to be applied to both parentage citizenship and soil of parents. This belief is also based on the 1874 USA Supreme Court decision in the Minor vs Happersett that explicitly dealt with the ‘concept’ as envisioned by the Founders.


83 posted on 01/31/2012 6:17:58 PM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: manc
The man has never talked about social issue, he has said on his show that he does nto care who marries who but then states how Catholic he is, what utter B/S

His incident with Euteneuer, among other things, show that he does not really care about being Catholic. He said he would join Jerry Falwell's church if he got excommunicated.

Hannity always seems like he's more about fiscal issues and jingoistic rhetoric. His current show is not worth watching.

84 posted on 01/31/2012 6:30:33 PM PST by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

Hadn’t thought of that. :-)


85 posted on 01/31/2012 6:30:56 PM PST by mupcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2
If I read correctly, the argument is that Rubio fits the ‘concept’ for NBC of parents or child having relinquished allegiance to a foreign government i.e. Cuba. The parents by intent (I believe both parents were not yet naturalized at time of Rubio’s birth ) and Rubio by birth ( I’m taking that Rubio was born on USA soil). The matter of ‘concept’ is certainly valid for discussing the considerations of the Founding Fathers. There is much in the records since that time with some court records. My personal belief is that the ‘concept of allegiance’ was intended by the Founders to be applied to both parentage citizenship and soil of parents. This belief is also based on the 1874 USA Supreme Court decision in the Minor vs Happersett that explicitly dealt with the ‘concept’ as envisioned by the Founders.

On this question I will defer to superior research. From what I have learned, it is plausible for it to go either way. It would not bother me at all if Rubio was considered to be a natural born citizen. Unlike Barack Obama, Rubio's father DID become a citizen.

86 posted on 01/31/2012 6:37:06 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I don't think Obama knows for sure. And, i sure as hell don't care what you think.

You birthers make me laugh.

Let me get this straight... You don't think Obama knows for sure, yet people who question it make you laugh? Got it. The reaction is mutual.

87 posted on 01/31/2012 6:40:22 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: manc
When last year don’t ask was to be overturned we vets tried a lot to get in touch with him as he says he supprts the military.

Years ago, I tried to get on to talk about some homo thing the schools were doing. I was RUDELY hung up on by the call screener. They don't dare bring up homosexuality.

88 posted on 01/31/2012 6:48:14 PM PST by stevio (God, guns, guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Are you saying you do not care that the commander of our military has allegiance to foreign powers?

Regardless of a birth certificate or his father’s nationality, we have all seen this reprobate’s incessant bowing before leaders of foreign nations. We have also seen him belittle, mock, and tarnish our nation as if he were a foreigner himself (and he is). Should this not get your attention?

I assume all this does not concern you, as we have not been at war on our own soil against foreign armies in quite some time. It would never ever happen again…correct?

I do not blame you for being cavalier, but I do accuse you for being proudly ignorant.


89 posted on 01/31/2012 7:06:22 PM PST by devattel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xG6WHxvsqq4
90 posted on 01/31/2012 7:13:20 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Rubio is a disappointment to me also. He sounds like a politician now, so demure and smooth and nice to all parties republican. And he influenced the latino vote today towrds Mitt.


91 posted on 01/31/2012 7:18:53 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Stick to what you’re qualified to do.


92 posted on 01/31/2012 7:18:59 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Eh ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: devattel
You should go back and reread my comment.
It had nothing to do with Barky, who may or may not have been born in the USA. I can't say one way or the other and neither can you.

Qualifications for the presidency are clear; Born in the US, at least age 35, and 14 years of residency in the US. Rubio fits the bill. Romney does as well.

Rubio isn't running and Romney is not my choice. Twisting the issues by inserting a fictitious “natural born” (mom and pop have to be born here or some such) is not supported by law or any court decision.

93 posted on 01/31/2012 7:27:15 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Eh ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Stick to what you’re qualified to do.

What do you consider me qualified to do?
Am I, in your opinion, only qualified to sit down and STFU?

Would you like me to pose my unanswered question to you?

94 posted on 01/31/2012 7:29:24 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: West Texas Chuck
Michael Berry is great! He has a new schedule that I am having trouble getting used to. He is on from 8am to 11am before Rush, then again from 5pm till 7pm. I just can't get in the swing of the new hours.
95 posted on 01/31/2012 7:34:24 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Qualifications for the presidency are clear; Born in the US, at least age 35, and 14 years of residency in the US.
You've left something out. Here, I'll give you a link so you can cure your ignorance...from www.house.gov/house
THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
Clause 5: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

What is that?! Why, you missed something...except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution...

You really shouldn't tell blatant lies. People will not trust you.

Here, I'll make it even more simple for you.
If "born in the US" were what the Founding Fathers had intended then why have there been so many attempts to change the Constitution to what you're saying it already says?

5. Attempts to redefine or amend Article II “natural born Citizen” Clause of the U.S. Constitution:

96 posted on 01/31/2012 7:45:31 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I do not have to re-read your comments. You apparently missed the U.S. Loyalty Express on the way over here.

It does not matter where you are born, or who you are born to. It only matters which countries lay claim to your sovereignty and where your allegiance lies.

As someone else mentioned on here, a cat born in an oven does not make it a biscuit.

97 posted on 01/31/2012 7:50:25 PM PST by devattel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Readability Calculator

Indication of the number of years of formal education that a person requires in order to easily understand the text on the first reading
Gunning Fog index : 14.98

Let me know if I need to rephrase the question.

98 posted on 01/31/2012 8:15:10 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: nesnah

This is about as surprising as “Benedict XVI Is A Catholic”.


99 posted on 01/31/2012 8:34:13 PM PST by energized
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nesnah
I have the MSM News channels INCLUDING FOX blocked on my Direct TV Guide. I did this some time ago. I don't listen too talk radio either. The last radio host I listened too was Alan Keyes back years ago when he was simulcasted on TV on a station ran by Paul Weyrich.

I get most of my news on line through several sources. I learned a long time ago Fox News was simply a glorified talking head network lacking in conservative substance with their host and panel guest generally being Placebo Conservatives.

Fox News was fairly good the first couple of years till it went establishment. I tried to watch Hannity in the 2008 elections. His rudeness and arrogance had me quickly changing channels. When a person ask a question it is just good manners and good journalism to allow them to answer uninterrupted. O'Rielly lacked that as well.

100 posted on 01/31/2012 8:56:19 PM PST by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson