Skip to comments.
Increased CO2 Emissions Will Delay Next Ice Age ( And that is a good thing!)
watts up with that? ^
| January 8, 2012
| Anthony Watts
Posted on 01/08/2012 9:21:33 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; landsbaum; Signalman; NormsRevenge; steelyourfaith; Lancey Howard; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Fat chance....The next ice age will come when it wants to.
I am sick of these faux and pseudo climate scientist.
3
posted on
01/08/2012 9:23:56 PM PST
by
AlexW
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
104 Responses to Increased CO2 Emissions Will Delay Next Ice Age
To: AlexW
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Climate change sucks.
6
posted on
01/08/2012 9:34:21 PM PST
by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Cheers!
7
posted on
01/08/2012 9:52:09 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I somewhat doubt that all the CO2 we could possibly create would keep the next ice age from happening. But it is nice to see someone talking about the other side of the climate coin re CO2 for a change. Does anyone really think that 90,000 years of bitter cold and constant raging winds is going to be a good thing?
8
posted on
01/08/2012 10:17:05 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
9
posted on
01/08/2012 10:41:42 PM PST
by
pallis
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
10
posted on
01/08/2012 10:50:17 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> - - -)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It’ll delay it by about, oh, a day at most.
11
posted on
01/08/2012 11:22:33 PM PST
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
We’ve been in an ice age for 3 million years or so.
What’s coming is the next glaciation.
And the trivial amount of CO2 in our atmosphere is not going to delay it.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Since there seems to be some confusion about all this, I’ll explain it for all you scientists and activists.
It’s going to get really cold. There will be really cool things to find on the beaches as the oceans recede. We’ll all be dead of old age by then, and so will be our grandchildren and theirs.
Oh, and if you believe we didn’t land on the moon, that the WTC was imploded, or that homeopathy works, take some Thorazine.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
One thing liberals can all agree on: We’re doomed!!!!
14
posted on
01/08/2012 11:34:10 PM PST
by
Rocky
(REPEAL IT!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
15
posted on
01/09/2012 12:07:49 AM PST
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; grey_whiskers; ApplegateRanch; Whenifhow; WL-law; Berlin_Freeper; Horusra; ...
16
posted on
01/09/2012 3:15:32 AM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Increased CO2 Emissions Will Delay Next Ice Age ( And that is a good thing!)
Well, perhaps they'll delay the next period of glaciation in the current ice age.
17
posted on
01/09/2012 3:18:19 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: Rocky
One thing liberals can all agree on: Were doomed!!!! Yeah. I remember Global Cooling in the 70s. An Ice Age was coming to kill mankind. But Global Cooling died it's death when the predictions (and computer models) failed.
After this it was Global Warming, there would be no polar bears, no snow in England and hurricanes galore hitting the United States. None of that happened, so Global Warming had to die.
Right now it's called Global Climate Change with warnings of Apocalyptic disasters in 2012.
But now, Possible Ice Age? Perhaps they are going to trot out Global Cooling again?
This reminds me of the Boy who Cried Wolf...
18
posted on
01/09/2012 3:30:32 AM PST
by
sr4402
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The weird thing is that virtually all the effects of CO2 concentration on temperature is accomplished over the first 80-100ppm, after that it's an increasingly small effect with increasingly larger amounts of CO2. As far as its correlation with temperature change goes, four times between
60 to 20 thousand years before present, it's bumped up between 600-1200 years
after an increase in warmth. But temperature can crash abruptly in the midst of higher atmospheric CO2 which then usually takes much longer to decrease afterwards. The general trend over the past 175 million years has been to an increasingly poor CO2 concentration. And
over the last 500 million years, the three periods with highest atmospheric CO2 were relatively cool. Over the same 500 million years the lag between temperature increase and CO2 increase ranges between 1000-5000 years.
19
posted on
01/09/2012 3:47:06 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Since bolide impacts cannot be called up to orderActually, they can. Our present technology is adequate to allow us to "steer" comets to impact with the earth.
Major possible negative side-effects, of course, depending on where the comet impacts.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson