Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I don't want to see any clear winner. A deadlocked convention is what might select the "perfect" candidate. Of course such "perfection" is a myth. Folks in 1980 even worried that Ronald Reagan was "too old" to govern or was "unelectable" as another Goldwater. Neither proved to be true.
1 posted on 12/03/2011 4:40:58 AM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PJ-Comix
no, Palin is not going to the nominee. She said she isn't running.
2 posted on 12/03/2011 4:43:33 AM PST by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Whenwhenwhen will we EVER learn to DECIDE THE ISSUES FIRST—then and only then find our candidate??

This way we never would tolerate the flood of Illegals—Sharia, never have ‘COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM’............


3 posted on 12/03/2011 4:46:02 AM PST by Flintlock (Photo ID for all voters. Let the dead rest in peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

There’s always talk of a brokered convention at this stage of an open presidential primary.

Per usual it is highly unlikely.


5 posted on 12/03/2011 4:55:07 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix; Envisioning; waterhill

Ah, if only we could reincarnate Reagan.


6 posted on 12/03/2011 4:55:11 AM PST by ixtl ( You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

No.

Put down the bong.


9 posted on 12/03/2011 5:09:04 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

The problem with a potential brokered convention is that the result might be a Jeb Somebody.

That would be even worse than the current contenders. First, we still have the taint from the last ‘Somebody’ and Second, we don’t need any more family dynasties — EVER.

Romney continues to flounder around 20%. He can’t seem to get much more traction, even as the #1’s fall by the wayside.

Gingrich, the current #1 flavor, is the most beltway insider in recent history. Washington is part of the problem. Gingrich is part of Washington and has been for 2 decades. Ergo, Gingrich is part of the problem in Washington. The big problem with Gingrich is that one never knows which side he is going to be on. One issue may result in a couch photo-op with Pelosi, another might be a Contract with America, and another might be some under-the-table stuff that could result in another ethics investigation. Gingrich is a toss-up, and that is scary.

Santorum and Huntsman need to stay tuned. They could still have their opportunities as #1 Flavor of the Week.

[Even with record lows, Obama still hovers round 49% with his base. As we saw Thursday, the FED can do a lot of numeric manipulation to make both the jobs and economics numbers look good by next fall. After nearly a year of MSM/Dem rehabilitation and resurrection, Obama will be a tough incumbent by next November.]


11 posted on 12/03/2011 5:22:54 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

The era of deadlocked conventions is over, because the leadership of both parties realized that by controlling the convention rules committee, they could dictate who the candidate would be.

In turn, this message is then sent out to the critical state parties, to insure they anoint the chosen one, which can be told ahead of time with a delegate count.

At this point, I’m pretty sure that the party leaders have chosen Romney to be the candidate, so his instructions are to just remain quiet, say nothing particularly controversial, and let the other candidates thrash around.

If any of them get too far ahead, then they will get critical party support weakened, and the Republican spin doctors, like Karl Rove, will actively undermine them.

When the convention rolls around, only Romney supporters will get to give the prime time speeches, and anyone else will be shoved to late night slots.

They also want to avoid any fiasco as what happened to the Democrats when Tip O’Neil took the podium, read off unpopular resolutions, and ignored the overwhelming “No!” from the crowd before declaring that “in the opinion of the chair, the ‘Aye’s’ have it.”

At this point, the only chance any other candidate has is for either Romney to horribly screw up, his funding to dry up, or the rank and file so profoundly rejecting him that the leadership chooses some other RINO.

Conservative? Oh, heck no. The leadership would prefer a radical leftist Democrat president to a conservative. Reagan was a fluke, and they bitterly hated every minute of his presidency.


12 posted on 12/03/2011 5:23:23 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Palin?


15 posted on 12/03/2011 5:28:03 AM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
I think with some confidence Romney will not win the primary.

I think Newt is viable, but personally I really just want to see any kind of "debate" with zero ... or whomever.

I think Santorum is being given short shrift because he wanted to maintain a majority and Michelle is ... I'm sorry to say this ... a woman, and after having ONE culture shock that hasn't been good, I don't think America will vote for a woman.

Cain should stay in the race for no other reason than to polarize the race baiting the democrats are guilty of. The talk shows and news/pundits wouldn't be able to sit still if Herman stays in ... they'd internally hemmorhage.

I don't know what to think of Perry, but I'd take him over Romney any day.


When it's all said and done, I think we will have a clear candidate from the primary

18 posted on 12/03/2011 5:37:20 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
If the GOP gets their way and Mittens is chosen because he is next, then it will be interesting to see the collective conservative reaction.
*
I will not vote for a RINO and if obama is reelected it is the fault of the GOP not me. Both parties are steering us toward socialism, one party is just driving faster than the other. If obama is reelected then I can fight the revolution that brings him down and reestablishes our republic. If RINOs are elected then that revolution will take place sometime in the future. My son is three and my daughter is three months. If RINOs are elected then they have to fight that revolution. I'd rather do the fighting for them and re-secure their liberties.
20 posted on 12/03/2011 5:41:44 AM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

I wish there was a candidate to choose from.


21 posted on 12/03/2011 5:44:20 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

In my dreams.

26 posted on 12/03/2011 5:52:55 AM PST by McGruff (Hold the House, retake the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

There hasn’t been a brokered convention in something like 60 years, long before the current primary and caucus system started. Someone will make a break during January or February and get momentum enough to take sufficient delegates.


27 posted on 12/03/2011 6:01:50 AM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Unless Palin runs, we will probably get another 4 years of the Vacation Boy and the Wookie.


31 posted on 12/03/2011 6:12:51 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Defeat Obama. End Obama's War On Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
"I won't name the person but he/she is a solid conservative with a lot of political experience and a great speaker who would be a slam dunk winner in November."

Rubio? Demint? Barbour?

Give us a hint, PJ.

33 posted on 12/03/2011 6:21:55 AM PST by SnuffaBolshevik (In a tornado, even turkeys can fly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Not very likely.

To have a first ballot fail, you’d need the plurality holder to be short of a majority by MORE than the sum of superdelegates and delegates previously pledged to early state dropouts, because, as happened with Obama, you can count on virtually all of them falling behind the plurality holder in the name of democracy. That in turn requires two very-closely-matched candidates and a strong third pulling delegates deep into the calendar. District and statewide winner-take all rules make that hard to achieve.


45 posted on 12/03/2011 8:21:13 AM PST by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson