He has NO political experience or track record and has never had to create or enact policy of any kind in his life. Hence he has no track record, and no track record of even having to make anything other than talk-show-host type opinions on anything.
As for his successful industries, aside from his employment as a paid lobbyist, why don’t you do a little research on an energy investment scheme with which he was involved only a few years ago...which collapsed and where much of the money mysteriously disappeared.
Are you really THIS clueless? What do you think it takes to be a successful CEO of large corporations? Corporations have employment policies, investment policies, operating policies, etc. etc. There is not that much difference between a managerial CEO and a managerial President. The skill sets are remarkably similar.
As for his successful industries, aside from his employment as a paid lobbyist, why don’t you do a little research on an energy investment scheme with which he was involved only a few years ago...which collapsed and where much of the money mysteriously disappeared.
I will check that out.
You’re right that he’s not been a government bureaucrat.
But he has created and enacted policies that have turned around very large organizations headed for financial collapse.
Are you saying that he’s only been a “paid” lobbyist, and never worked as Vice President at Pillsbury, that he never became VP at Burger King (over 450 restaurants), that he never became President/CEO of Godfather’s Pizza, that he was never President of the National Restaurant Association, that he was never Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City? Really?
Regarding the “energy investment scheme,” I’m assuming you’re talking about Aquila. The truth (which you don’t care much about, clearly) is that Cain was NEVER named in the lawsuit because he had NO oversight for the particular division whatsoever. But you can claim some sort of guilt by association because your hatred of Cain is blind, like you.
Amazing how you cling to ignorance, and seem to pride yourself in such ignorance, rather than avail yourself of easily-accessible information.
Do I come across harshly? If so, it’s because I hate to see a man lynched over things for which he is not guilty. You — whether you realize it or not — are a party to the lynching.