Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Here's your chance ya'll.

I value your opinions.....that's why I'm asking.

1 posted on 11/23/2011 6:38:19 AM PST by TheRobb7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: TheRobb7

The one person who really ought to be on that stage is quietly watching this slow motion train wreck, while millions wish she’d reconsider her decision.


2 posted on 11/23/2011 6:42:59 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

Cain, Bachmann, and Santorum are all good.


3 posted on 11/23/2011 6:43:33 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

Cain

His economic plan, his empowerment instead of entitlement attitude, his ability to see a problem and attack it are why he still has my vote.


4 posted on 11/23/2011 6:43:58 AM PST by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

I think a Cain/Bachmann ticket would be ideal.

Mix their fiscal and domestic strengths with Bachmann’s foreign policy prowess and they’d be great.

I personally think Bachmann should top the ticket but I don’t think she can be.


5 posted on 11/23/2011 6:44:02 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

Newt.


6 posted on 11/23/2011 6:44:05 AM PST by Carry me back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7
You first. LOL.

Let's rip your guys/gal a new a$$ before I tell you who I like.

(I'm kidding)

People are really being over sensitive. We debate because we all believe in what is best for the nation. We are all on the same side with differing opinions. It's ok to disagree.

Avoid arguments of feeling. State positions, reasons and logic. Provide links when necessary. Avoid name calling and denigration of fellow FReepers (unless they say something really, really ignorant about support for Romney or Paul).

Eventually, we need to all line up, support and defend the nominee that wins the primaries.

Happy Thanksgiving.

Now let's get ready to ruuuummmmbbbbbllllllle.

7 posted on 11/23/2011 6:45:43 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Liberals vote like clowns walking thru a minefield, oblivious to the consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7
This is part of the process.

If you can't stand the heat, get out of the chicken....errrrr, kitchen.

8 posted on 11/23/2011 6:46:50 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

Speaker Gingrich is standing even more strongly on my list. Perry and Cain are there too.


9 posted on 11/23/2011 6:46:50 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7
I value your opinions.

Thats clear from the way you phrased your question.

11 posted on 11/23/2011 6:47:43 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

I’d like to put Newt, Cain, Bachmann and yes, Huntsman in a blender and take out the good parts from each and discard the detritus.

Can I do that?


12 posted on 11/23/2011 6:47:43 AM PST by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7
Santorum or Huntsman? No, because they apparently aren't pure enough either.

My opposition to Huntsman is that he was Obama's bootlicker. Being a sponge-spined RINO is bad enough, but actually serving in the enemy camp is simply unacceptable. During the presidential debates, Obummer would simply ask, "If you think my policies are so bad, then why did you work for me?"
13 posted on 11/23/2011 6:47:46 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7
Think people upset about this vetting of the candidates might want to listen to Newt Gingrich's words on the issue.

"In the next three weeks, I predict to you we will have all sorts of questions about me. And it's fine. You can not ask the people of the United States to loan you the most powerful governmental job in the world, particularly in a campaign that's promising very dramatic change, and not have them vet you carefully and thoroughly," Gingrich said.

14 posted on 11/23/2011 6:48:05 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

I wanted Sarah Palin, I will support Herman Cain and Michelle Bachmann. None of the rest give me any feeling of enthusiasm. I will say that I will not support Mr. Romney, I’ll still vote but I will not vote for President at that point.


15 posted on 11/23/2011 6:48:54 AM PST by The Working Man (The mantra for BO's reign...."No Child Left a Dime")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

Romney is a liberal - NO
Hunstman is a liberal with a softer voice - NO
Paul is an anti-Semitic isolationist - NO
Cain - ?
Perry - ?
Santorum - I like the guy but no
Bachman - Great qualities she just rubs me raw - probably not
Gingrich - ?
Today Nove 23, 2011 at 640 AM PST - who knows what tomorrow will bring.


16 posted on 11/23/2011 6:48:59 AM PST by svcw (God's Grace - thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

The crucifixions that you speak of are the reason I don’t come here (FR)much anymore.


17 posted on 11/23/2011 6:49:09 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

While we might not agree with every candidates opinion, we whould all agree that it’s better than what we have now.


18 posted on 11/23/2011 6:50:12 AM PST by mikefive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

This is our chance to show the candidates that we’re not going to take any of their carp when he or she becomes our President.


19 posted on 11/23/2011 6:50:35 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

I would support Mickey Mouse against Obama if he was the nominee. Inasmuch as the nominee will most likely be decided before my states Primary, I will support that nominee whoever he or she is. Those of you voting in States that may decide the nominee I would advise to answer the question”who has the best chance of beating Obama” and that is where your vote ought to go. This is one year where for the sake of the Nation, beating Obama is more important than ideology.


22 posted on 11/23/2011 6:52:11 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

I am supporting Rick Perry because, out of all the GOP candidates, he has the most executive branch experience (12+ years), has governed one of the largest states in the union, Texas has created more jobs than any state in the union combined, supported the Tea Party before there was a Tea Party, is solidly socially conservative, has an amazing economic plan, basically wants to apply the Texas model of government to Washington DC (works in Texas, would work in DC!), can deliver fiery speeches and is JUST PLAIN AWESOME!

FREEDOM, PROSPERITY, RESPONSIBILITY: RICK PERRY, 2012!


25 posted on 11/23/2011 6:54:13 AM PST by wk4bush2004 ("FREEDOM, PROSPERITY, RESPONSIBILITY: RICK PERRY 2012!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheRobb7

Huge point you made there. NOW is the chance, before Iowa, to coalesce. If we don’t make dang sure that Iowa and SC bring out one strong non-Romney, we have to send a ton of money to him or her now. Or soon. Seriously.

We don’t have a Perfect Candidate. They don’t exist, and a lot of good people don’t want the job.

One of this pack is strong, conservative, and a refreshing outsider, and that is Herman Cain. He is bold enough to stand up to the media, and he’s proved that. He can do what we want, which is to tell and show Americans that constitutional conservatism works best for all Americans to have a chance at a good life.

Perry and gingrich have too much pity for bad guys. According to their stance on illegals, if they find a terrorist who’s had a family, or who’s been here a long time, why, it would be cruel to remove him from his family. Good thing they weren’t at osama’s compound with seal team 6.

Seriously, Cain could beat Obama. He is more real and likable than Obama. There is the same race so that becomes moot for all but liberals. And it’s the apolitical ( better term than independents) whom we need to convince. A lot of them have been hurt by Obama.

I think Cain is our best shot at besting Obama.


28 posted on 11/23/2011 6:57:38 AM PST by Yaelle (Herman Cain: the clever conservative with cojones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson