Posted on 11/11/2011 4:17:13 PM PST by Lancey Howard
...he would soon be heading into his second decade in prison.
But Jerry Sandusky did NOT bring little girls home to the Sandusky household or taken a little girl as his guest to the Outback Bowl. That would have raised eyebrows. No. Sandusky always seemed to have little boys around, so that was okay. That was safe, everybody told themselves. And what could they say about it anyway?
Had the 1998 witness seen Sandusky fondling or raping a 10-year-old girl rather than a little boy, and had the burly 28-year-old former PSU quarterback Mike McQueary witnessed Sandusky raping a 10-year-old girl, there would have been no running to Daddy or waiting until the next day to tell somebody about it. There would have been no hesitation about what to do. There would have been no reluctance to point the finger and condemn Sandusky as a pedophile.
At the very core of Penn State's ruinous scandal, homosexuality is the elephant in the room - - homosexuality and the political correctness that comes with it. Regular old pedophilia is easy to get publicly outraged about. Even the suspicion of regular old pedophilia elicits menacing sneers at the accused.
But little boys? Well, that's different. That's a homosexual thing, and well, you just have to be... careful. Especially on a college campus where the homosexual "community" rules the day. (Shrug. Gotta be "tolerant" don't you know... enlightened and all that stuff. ..because I'm a good, live-and-let-live person. Que sera sera. Who am I to judge? Etc.)
Homosexuality. Yes, George and Jerry, there's something wrong with that.
When Graham Spanier took over the reins as Penn State's president in 1995 he vowed to make the campus the most LGBT-friendly campus in the nation. Since the arrival of Grahm Spanier as university president, Penn State has sponsored 'the Tent of Consent' all about gay sex - - as well as C*ntfest. (Remember that?)
Somebody please ping me if they happen to spot a Sandusky story out of the Democrat "mainstream" newsrooms that uses the phrase "predatory homosexual pedophile", or even just the word "homosexual"! Even now, the Democrat "mainstream" newsrooms are dancing around the obvious, ignoring the elephant in the room.
My wish is to call him Wormfood
I cannot understand the adult who would do anything like this to a child, any child. It goes against the primary instinct of a true man to protect the children. As a grandfather, I relish those moments to take them to the park and watch them run and play. (since we are being honest, to play on the playground with them :) )
Sandusky could have been raping nuns and murdering Girl Scouts and Penn State would have protected him.
I didn’t post a whine. I simply posted the truth. Why does the truth scare you so much?
You wrote:
“You may want to go talk to my boss about that one. He gave His life for me, so Im no longer counted as His enemy, and therefore, no longer evil.”
I did talk to your Boss about that. He says those who attack and denigrate His Body are committing evil. You might want to talk to Him yourself. He’s left messages on your home phone, but you never responded because you were distracted by your own high opinion of yourself.
it’s not just a gay thing.
If a 35 year old male teacher seduces a 14-15 year old girl, it’s statutory rape and the guy should go to prison.
If a 35 year old female teacher seduces a 14-15 year old BOY, it’s alright if she’s good-looking enough.
A much older woman could not POSSIBLY screw up a boy’s head with mind-games. Riiiight...
Heck, most of the 45 year old guys around here can’t handle a 24 year old woman’s head-games and manipulation. But somehow an innocent teenager can’t get screwed up or damaged as long as he has an orgasm.
According to the FReeper males around here and the homosexual activists, boys are fair game and there is no need to protect them.
I’m with you on this one...although I am not Catholic, ALL of my Catholic friends were outraged by the church’s inaction and condemned them vigorously. Every one of them...
Our culture has done much to devalue manhood as well as boyhood over the past several decades. To some degree, McQueery's inaction may reflect that.
I just read in another post that (rumor has it) all but two of Sandusky’s known victims were little black boys. Could this be why McQueary failed to act? Could this be part of the reason people let themselves look the other way? “Gee. Little at-risk black boys. That’s a shame. Is our game televised this week?”
I saw part of the interview with a mother of one of the boys this morning. Although she was in the shadows, it seemed to me that she African American. I’m afraid this will add a whole other dimension that could only increase the ugliness (if what you say turns out to be true).
Oh, this will get uglier. There is no bottom to this sewer.
Thanks, Lancey, for your comments.
There is indeed an embedded homosexual culture at Penn Stae, and it stretches from the Athletic Department to the
Sociology Department (Women’s Studies is an abomination) to the Music and Theater Departments (no surprise there) and on and on and on.
We have sent a couple of our kids there over the past few decades, and the things they told us would curl your hair!
It’s really tough for the decent students from good homes to have to witness public sex, shower sex, all kinds of sex, but especially the homo sex that is in everyone’s face from Day One on the campus.
The Jerry Sandusky scandal has been decades in the making.
Priests, Abuse, and the Meltdown of a Culture. The lessons of an important new study.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2722053/posts?
Shock after Dutch priest endorses pedophilia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2723525/posts?page=29#29
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.