Posted on 10/23/2011 5:01:35 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
Been noticing something.
Liberals seem to be a bit jumpy about Marco Rubio.
Want to slime him. Almost like they were about Palin...
Interesting.
If nothing else its all gonna get very interesting.
Just last week there were allegations in Indiana of voter fraud during voter registrations on the left having to do with both hillary and zero.That looks like it will be coming up. So it never ends.
Amen!, only on these jendal&rubic-love-fests threads are you
able to see so many fake-FReepers. Having said that, i would do everything legally possible to ensure a jendal&rubic defeat for POTUS.
jendal potus = obama potus
rubio potus = obama potus
I forget the name of the Acorn turncoat who spoke at the FL5-Strawpoll. She said Acorn purposely hires very poor people, preferably crack-heads to make an unwritten daily quota of registrations. Whey they get caught, Acorn claims they wouldn't have hired such a person if they could have suspected what he/she was going to do.
Rubio should be everyones V.P. selection.
He’s not experienced enough for top dog yet but a term or two as V.P. would sure make him everyones next pick.
The dems are crazy afraid of Rubio because they look at the latin vote as their own. Same for blacks, fags, teachers and trial lawyers.
Were Rubio on the ticket as V.P. he’d deliver the majority of latins which is about thirty million more votes than joe (the drunk) biden delivered.
I have nothing against Senator Rubio. He has done a great job of articulating conservative principles that in some instances have changed the debate in the media in our favor. That, however, in and of itself is not a qualifier for the most demanding executive job in the world, that of the President that will follow Barack Hussein Obama. There are more qualified people who can become President without us resorting to the same level of experience that the Democrats did three years ago.
In addition, the major stumbling block that the next President will face in trying to enact reform and slash the government will be those 100 little dictators, years between elections, each with a feifdom carved out in the Senate. To truly pass sweeping reform the Republicans will need 60 seats, and over half of those will need to be either truly conservative or truly scared. Start counting. We don’t have the numbers. I pray the next President doesn’t pluck what few conservative senators we have for his cabinet or his VP slot. Rubio, Demint and others need to stay in the senate.
What part of “INELIGIBLE” don’t you understand?
So, trashing the Constitution as long as it's for our guy is okay?
Not where I come from.
OK I’ll bite.
Please explain exactly which statement where specifically in the Constitution of the United States you believe, states Marco Rubio is not eligible.
Please explain exactly how you believe it means he is not eligible. And show what text specifically, says so.
Be specific please. Don’t just waive your hands verbally saying terms like “natural born”.
I want a specific cite.
Go ahead please.
So you approve of anchor babies being eligible. Keep that in mind when the Dems run a Somali or a Chinese anchor baby.
Minor v Happersett.
John Bingham.
Emerich de Vattel.
You obviously support any anchor baby becoming president. I can think of no better way to destroy this nation.
Tell that to the soul of every baby aborted in the United States since 1973.
No issues at all. Born to two US citizen parents in a US territory.
Who says you do?
“Natural Law”
Wasn’t that a Jessie Ventura movie ?
You did not show anything, that I challenged you to provide.
You got nothing.
Not that I’m surprized, because there is nothing in the Constitution which would disqualify Rubio.
Thanks for playing though...
Even if Rubio isn’t NBC, would the DBM and DNC dare attack him for that, or even mention it?
Enjoy supporting your anchor babies.
And you challenge some of us on the Constitution?
I’m not saying there are not differing views on this.
I do know however, the Constitution is not organized in articles with names which use the term “vs.”...
You cited court cases. Not the US Constitution.
Sure they would. They'd claim that Obama's mother was enough to meet the requirements.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.