Skip to comments.
Sexual economics: Women more sexually promiscuous as "price of sex" declines
ABC Action News ^
| 10/6/11
| Kristal Roberts
Posted on 10/06/2011 9:34:25 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows
There was a time when having sex with a woman meant a wedding ring, a court ship or at the very least, dinner. But social psychologists say those days are quickly coming to an end as women become more promiscuous, Yahoo Shine reports.
-snip-
Other things that are said to have contributed to these changes include gender equality, birth control and internet porn.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcactionnews.com ...
TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortions; contraception; cows; easy; feminaziagenda; feminism; floozies; fornication; homosexualagenda; milk; mustbesweepsweek; napl; premaritalsex; promiscuity; sexualpromiscuity; sexualsin; sluts; std; stds; tramps; vaginalaccess; vaginalamericans; vaginas; vd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Discuss.
To: Slings and Arrows; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; ...
2
posted on
10/06/2011 9:36:15 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Slings and Arrows
Women more sexually promiscuous as "price of sex" declines And here I was waiting for a Groupon.
3
posted on
10/06/2011 9:40:36 PM PDT
by
txroadkill
(Antlers up! The Claw must be feared!)
To: Slings and Arrows
Other things that are said to have contributed to these changes include gender equality, birth control, internet porn, and fat chicks. You can't see the fat chicks for the fat chicks. And Ima thinking they think like me. If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards...
4
posted on
10/06/2011 9:40:36 PM PDT
by
bigheadfred
(But alas)
To: Slings and Arrows
To: Slings and Arrows
SLUTS!
[was that over the top? I can never tell]
:)
6
posted on
10/06/2011 9:41:29 PM PDT
by
Salamander
(Alice Cooper hit me with a stick.)
To: txroadkill; PJ-Comix
> Women more sexually promiscuous as "price of sex" declinesAnd here I was waiting for a Groupon.
Pinging the expert...
7
posted on
10/06/2011 9:42:36 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: KingKongCobra
I do believe you’ve nailed it...
...bad choice of words, huh?
8
posted on
10/06/2011 9:44:24 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Slings and Arrows
BTW, I grew up in the late 60s when the price of sex was ZERO as in “free love”. Maybe these idiot journalists should check with their grandparents for some pointers.
To: txroadkill
10
posted on
10/06/2011 9:45:09 PM PDT
by
Salamander
(Alice Cooper hit me with a stick.)
To: Salamander
11
posted on
10/06/2011 9:46:48 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Slings and Arrows
Between the “free sex” era of the 60’s, movies and TV causal sex (sex predominates most movies and TV), what do we expect? The era of virginal marriage is a thing of the past. In most TV programs, sex between unmarried couples seems to be the norm. Nobody just dates, they sleep together. This is what is projected on the youth of today.
12
posted on
10/06/2011 9:47:08 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
To: KingKongCobra
BTW, I grew up in the late 60s when the price of sex was ZERO as in free love. Act now and we'll throw in gonorrhea and crab lice at no extra charge!
13
posted on
10/06/2011 9:49:16 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: KingKongCobra
***BTW, I grew up in the late 60s when the price of sex was ZERO as in free love.***
Yep! I remember those days! It didn’t help me get laid one bit!
14
posted on
10/06/2011 9:51:15 PM PDT
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(Click my name. See my home page, if you dare! NEW PHOTOS & PAINTINGS)
To: Slings and Arrows
BS. The only difference between now and before is people talk about sex more now.
15
posted on
10/06/2011 9:52:54 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Those who are easily shocked... should be shocked more often. - Mae West)
To: Slings and Arrows
Yeah, we now have 13-year-old girls happily swapping around pictures of their privates on their phone-cameras to their schoolmates.
The culture has taken mind-boggling declines lately that most people haven’t even mentally registered yet.
16
posted on
10/06/2011 9:53:51 PM PDT
by
greene66
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
***BTW, I grew up in the late 60s when the price of sex was ZERO as in free love.***
“Yep! I remember those days! It didnt help me get laid one bit!”
Now I don’t know why but that just cracked me up. It’s funny everytime I read it. I have this picture of Sam Kinison saying it in my head.
To: KingKongCobra
Yeah but prices change - anybody know what the going rate is now?
To: DJlaysitup
19
posted on
10/06/2011 10:02:24 PM PDT
by
EEGator
To: greene66
Yeah, we now have 13-year-old girls happily swapping around pictures of their privates on their phone-cameras to their schoolmates. The culture has taken mind-boggling decline lately..
OK, Ok, ok...you know what? The only reason I didn't screw every available girl in high school and college (and there were many) was because of my upbringing.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson