[Netizen]

I do believe in God’s word, just that Paul wasn’t speaking for God.

I gave you the context from the Concordance, based on the word that Paul used. You on the other hand are blowing smoke and putting a meaning to the word that wasn’t intended.

Have a nice day.

[Westbrook]

> I do believe in God’s word, just that Paul wasn’t speaking for God

Really? Do you believe this, then?

2nd Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

So, is what Paul is teaching here scriptural or not? Inspired or not?

> I gave you the context from the Concordance

Webster's 1828 Dictionary defines "blood" thus.

BLOOD
1. The fluid which circulates through the arteries and veins of the human body, and of other animals.
2. Kindred ; relation by natural descent from a common ancestor; consanguinuity.
   God hath made of one blood, all nations of the earth. Acts xvii

Well, imagine that! Both Noah Webster and I see that verse in exactly the same way.

So, by your reckoning, Webster and I are both deficient in understanding plain English.