You don’t believe that the Bible is God’s Word, so you do not believe Paul was speaking for God.
I already got that, in case you missed it.
You refuse to recognize “blood” in the context here in which it is used, to denote ancestry or kin, a use very common throughout the ages in the English language as well as many others.
I already got that, too.
You are just repeating yourself, and I am repeating myself now, so I think our discussion is over.
I do believe in God’s word, just that Paul wasn’t speaking for God.
I gave you the context from the Concordance, based on the word that Paul used. You on the other hand are blowing smoke and putting a meaning to the word that wasn’t intended.
Have a nice day.