Everything you said is not definitive, or proof, nor the only scenario.
You don’t know who the last person to see Caylee alive was. You don’t know it was Casey.
You assumed you know.
So from your assumption, you created a series of events which may or may not have happened, or happened in the way you surmised.
Will you convict on the basis of your reasoning, that may or may not be correct?
Or will you judge on the basis of the facts entered into the record?
Could someone Casey is covering for, have taken those things of Caylee’s from the house? Could Casey have retrieved them, and given them to the killer?
What was the sequence of events offered by the prosecution?
You have not eliminated possibilities—you have opened new possibilities. How do you know that what you described is the way it went down?
Jackwagon the DEFENSE said there were only three people involved, Casey, Cindy and George. The defense said it was accidental, no kidnapping nothing like that. No other people were brought in as possible party or parties in the crime by the defense! Get it?
If you think it wasn't Casey then it was George or Cindy. Since George went around town hanging signs with the exact same roll of duct tape found on the body he is pretty stupid then
Yeah, it absolutely is definitive but you will never admit it.
I boxed you in a corner. It pretty much HAD to be Casey and NO ONE else and that is clear from the evidence but you don’t want it to be that way for reasons only known to you.
Maybe she reminds you of your daughter or sister or even your mother. Maybe you’re a young man and would like to get it on with a hot babe like this one or maybe you’re a woman who’d like to do the same. Casey swings both ways—something for everyone.
In any event I proved the point that it had to be Casey and now I’m done talking with you about it.