Yeah, it absolutely is definitive but you will never admit it.
I boxed you in a corner. It pretty much HAD to be Casey and NO ONE else and that is clear from the evidence but you don’t want it to be that way for reasons only known to you.
Maybe she reminds you of your daughter or sister or even your mother. Maybe you’re a young man and would like to get it on with a hot babe like this one or maybe you’re a woman who’d like to do the same. Casey swings both ways—something for everyone.
In any event I proved the point that it had to be Casey and now I’m done talking with you about it.
ReallyDairyland, people CAN disagree with you and NOT be evil. You’ve crossed some kind of line that doesn’t need crossing.
There's no box, and there is no corner.
It pretty much HAD to be Casey and NO ONE else and that is clear from the evidence but you don’t want it to be that way for reasons only known to you.
You certainly don't know that, nor did the prosecution prove that. You have ASSUMED that, based on your view of what you think are the only possibilities.I am saying that is not necessarily true, and the prosecution did nothing to eliminate other possibilities.
Maybe she reminds you of your daughter or sister or even your mother. Maybe you’re a young man and would like to get it on with a hot babe like this one or maybe you’re a woman who’d like to do the same. Casey swings both ways—something for everyone.
Wow. Even a member of the Flying Wallendas would never make a leap into space like that.
That is possibly the most disgusting thing I have ever seen on FreeRepublic in over 12 years here.You don't know a thing about me, and yet you have pyschoanalyzed me--incorrectly to boot.
This is why you should never be on a jury--you recklessly leap into space based on faulty assumptions.
And you can apologize for ascribing those filthy motives to me. Your statement says far more about you than it does about me.