Posted on 05/15/2011 6:40:51 AM PDT by Daffynition
In May 1861, Samuel Colt was Hartford's richest, most famous citizen.
A charismatic, driven entrepreneur, Colt possessed inventive genius, boundless imagination and unsurpassed marketing prowess. He had built an internationally renowned business centered in a state-of-the art armory in Hartford's South Meadows that produced the revolving handguns bearing his name.
Instruments of "moral reform,'' Colt once sardonically called his artful, deadly devices. How they were used, and by whom, did not trouble him much.
(Excerpt) Read more at courant.com ...
True about its faults. But what would have prevented the Federals from insisting the Henry company put on wooden forearms? In short, some of the faults could have been solved with a little pressure and/or money from the Federals. In any event, from the accounts I read, the Henry was very popular with the soldiers that used it. I guess it would be like the military switching from the M1 to the M16. The MI 30.6 cartridge had a more knocking down power than the M16 .223 cartridge, but the army concluded that going from a semi-automatic with stronger firepower to a fully automatic rifle with less firepower per bullet was worth it.
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe · |
|||
Antiquity Journal & archive Archaeologica Archaeology Archaeology Channel BAR Bronze Age Forum Discover Dogpile Eurekalert LiveScience Mirabilis.ca Nat Geographic PhysOrg Science Daily Science News Texas AM Yahoo Excerpt, or Link only? |
|
||
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · |
by contrast, Maj. Reno had retreated to a defensible hilltop, and was able to hold his position.
What Custer really needed was the Gatlings, which he left behind. His prior knowledge of the Lakota told him that no more than a thousand could be supported in a village. The encampment had over 15 thousand, but most were about to leave, as they had come together for a few days to resolve some leadership issues.
I think Custer saved Reno and Benteen. By that I mean once the Sioux and Cheyenne wiped out Custer they were done with serious fighting and just didn't have the discipline and determination to focus on Reno the same way they did on Custer. I always had the impression that Reno and Benteen barely managed to hold off the attacks they did face and they did not see the same number of attackers that Custer did.
"His prior knowledge of the Lakota told him that no more than a thousand could be supported in a village."
I don't know how he could have believed that - they had been following the Sioux trail - left by travois poles dragging in the dirt - and it was gigantic. Reno had struck that trail earlier and in some places it was hundreds of yards wide. Custer's Crow scouts knew the truth - I just don't know if he listened to them.
I think Custer was focused exclusively on offensive actions with no thought that he might actually have to play defense... until it was too late.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.