Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Ancient 'Nutcracker Man' really ate grass
Associated Press ^ | May 2, 2011 | RANDOLPH E. SCHMID

Posted on 05/02/2011 2:26:23 PM PDT by decimon

WASHINGTON – Nutcracker Man didn't eat nuts after all.

After a half-century of referring to an ancient pre-human as "Nutcracker Man" because of his large teeth and powerful jaw, scientists now conclude that he actually chewed grasses instead.

The study "reminds us that in paleontology, things are not always as they seem," commented Peter S. Ungar, chairman of anthropology at the University of Arkansas.

>

It turns out that the early human known as Paranthropus boisei did not eat nuts but dined more heavily on grasses than any other human ancestor or human relative studied to date. Only an extinct species of grass-eating baboon ate more, they said.

>

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: History; Science
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: decimon
It's Johnson, as in Lyndon Johnson. His SecDef Robert McNamara launched Project 100,000, a supposed anti-poverty program to take recruits into the Army who could not qualify on the AFQT, some with scores so low they would qualify as retarded. Disproportionate numbers were African-American, assigned to combat arms, mainly infantry, and sent to Vietnam, where they died in disproportionate numbers.

They contributed to the breakdown indiscipline and drug use that became problems during Vietnam.

Of course, postponing the day when deferments for white college kids would have to end had nothing to do with it. Uh, uh.

Just another liberal program inflicted on America and its military.

21 posted on 05/03/2011 1:39:42 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Disproportionate numbers were African-American, assigned to combat arms, mainly infantry, and sent to Vietnam, where they died in disproportionate numbers.

What I've read is that blacks died proportionately in Vietnam.

22 posted on 05/03/2011 1:46:59 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: decimon
What I've read is that blacks died proportionately in Vietnam.

Blacks were 7264 of the 58,193 Vietnam deaths. 12.5%, almost exactly the same as their demographic representation in the US population.

23 posted on 05/03/2011 1:59:03 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Blacks were 7264 of the 58,193 Vietnam deaths. 12.5%, almost exactly the same as their demographic representation in the US population.

That is in line with what I've read.

24 posted on 05/03/2011 2:13:55 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: decimon
At least one source (take it for what it's worth) claims that the proportion of blacks killed was higher early in the war, and it was only under pressure from above that the numbers leveled out as the war went on.
25 posted on 05/03/2011 2:39:05 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Could be. It could be that blacks were disproportionately drafted early on. I went in at the very end of 1965 and can’t say I saw that, though.


26 posted on 05/03/2011 2:48:08 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]



There Are a Couple of Odd Ducks Here
But They’re Very Entertaining


Sponsoring FReepers leapfrog0202 and another person will contribute $10
Each time a new monthly donor signs up!
Get more bang for your buck
Sign up today

Come back, Lazamataz! We miss you.

27 posted on 05/03/2011 3:27:46 PM PDT by TheOldLady (Almost as evil as the Freeper Criminal Mastermind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: decimon
The casualty difference wasn't a great as many people think. In the Vietnam War proportionally more African-Americans were in the Army's combat branches but they only suffered approximately 1% more of the casualties than their proportion of total Army personnel.

Today, the situation has reversed with proportionally more African-Americans in support branches, which is a matter of self-selection. It seems blacks are more likely to use Army service as a way to acquire skills perceived to be more useful in civilian life while more white kids are the gung-ho send me to the Infantry and let me kill bad guys types.

28 posted on 05/03/2011 4:13:10 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Vegans have always been with us and they always end up extinct.


29 posted on 05/03/2011 7:32:19 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

“They contributed to the breakdown indiscipline and drug use that became problems during Vietnam.”

Personally, I blame the Beatles for that.


30 posted on 05/03/2011 9:11:25 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
You have to remember that Johnsons 100K also was a part of a lowering of standards across the military, you too Marines.

It sucked, those people were disciplinary problems and general f**K ups, I was lucky to have some broken bones that got me out in 8/68, my stepbrother, Marine 2-7 second tour, said they drove him nuts.

31 posted on 05/05/2011 3:37:15 PM PDT by Little Bill (Sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson