Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Atlas Shrugged: Part I' Derails?
Box Office Mojo ^ | April 17, 2011 | Brandon Gray

Posted on 04/18/2011 5:56:00 PM PDT by winstonwolf33

Atlas Shrugged: Part I was the top-grossing limited release of the weekend, generating an estimated $1.7 million at 300 single-screen locations.

For a pure independent release, Atlas Shrugged: Part I's opening was fine. But for the first-ever adaptation of Ayn Rand's influential mega-selling 1957 novel that had far more media hype than any other independent movie could dream of, it was disappointing.

There aren't many direct comparisons, because it's rare that an adaptation of such a famous book gets such a modest release. Atlas Shrugged: Part I opened higher than recent limited Christian movies The Grace Card and To Save a Life, and it was distributor Rocky Mountain Pictures' third highest-grossing launch, behind End of the Spear and Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. But none of those movies are significant in the grand scheme of things. They're all still blips, even if Atlas was a slightly bigger blip than many.

What's more, Atlas Shrugged: Part I's box office dropped six percent from Friday to Saturday, further indicating niche appeal. The movie would require exceptional holds moving forward to right its course.

Atlas Shrugged: Part I was reportedly produced for $10 million in a rush to retain the movie rights before they reverted back to Ayn Rand's estate, and its producers eschewed Hollywood (only one theater showed it in the Los Angeles area) after decades of failed attempts. Instead, they took a grass roots approach and tried to capitalize on the Tea Party movement, which was credited with the Republicans' landslide win in last November's election.

(Excerpt) Read more at boxofficemojo.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: atlasshrugged; aynrand; hollywood; moviereview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
I had a feeling this movie wasn't gonna make a lot of money.

The combo of no big-name stars and the film's talky storyline was probably the main reason.

1 posted on 04/18/2011 5:56:10 PM PDT by winstonwolf33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33

I still liked it and will get a DVD when it comes around.


2 posted on 04/18/2011 6:02:17 PM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33

The film didn’t need any “big name” stars to sell. It was made for 10 mil, and the highest per screen average. Now it goes to DVD where money is made and on track to outperform Fireproof’ where 3 years ago, became the top 3 DVD seller.


3 posted on 04/18/2011 6:05:42 PM PDT by max americana (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I really liked the movie.


4 posted on 04/18/2011 6:09:09 PM PDT by CharlotteVRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33

It’s a quagmire in week one, just like the Iraq war! < / s >


5 posted on 04/18/2011 6:10:24 PM PDT by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33
I had a feeling this movie wasn't gonna make a lot of money.

This is one of those movies that will not make big bucks at the box office, but may very well pay for itself many times over through continuing DVD and Netflix sales. I can see people paying to download it many years from now.

6 posted on 04/18/2011 6:17:42 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33
...that had far more media hype than any other independent movie could dream of, it was disappointing.

Okay. I've been sick but where was all of this "far more media hype" this guy is talking about? I've never heard one thing about it on the boob tube and never saw one ad. I think somebody been hittin' da happy smoke again. I learned about it after reading about it on FR and then going to their website.

7 posted on 04/18/2011 6:18:18 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The "Rich" is not obligated to provide anyone with a BIG nanny state government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33

I liked it. It was timely with it`s message,(frighteningly so) and I`m looking forward to the next installment. The CDs will ensure there`s money enough to finish this trilogy, and I,(for one) intend to add them to my movie collection.


8 posted on 04/18/2011 6:23:38 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

A few of those DVD sales will be me buying them to give as gifts.

I wasn’t expecting a triumph of the human spirit (thank you Tommy Kirk MST3K) but for my 2 cents, it was well made enough where ADD me stayed fixed just about all the time.

The end was a good one. I won’t spoil it.

If it weren’t for Facebook I would have probably never heard of this movie until well after it left theaters. I was actually enjoying going to the movies for the first time in ages. It has been a good couple of years I think since the last time I went.


9 posted on 04/18/2011 6:25:14 PM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: max americana

It did have Quark from ST DS9 and Fat Rollie from a couple of Starsky & Hutch episodes (among many other things of course) and that was good enough for me. The message means more than the players in this case. For non-household names, they did pretty well.

I could have seen Claudia Christian as Dagny. She can certainly do tough and savvy. Ivanova was one my favorite characters on B5. I hated seeing her go before S5.


10 posted on 04/18/2011 6:29:32 PM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33

We enjoyed Part I and look forward to Part II.

Our theater was 3/4 full on a Sunday evening.


11 posted on 04/18/2011 6:30:30 PM PDT by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33
Media hype? Disappointing release? The movie was originally slated to open in roughly 20 theaters... and ended up opening in 300. And the "hype" from the media and marketing worlds?
12 posted on 04/18/2011 6:31:33 PM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33
The combo of no big-name stars

What? It had that guy I saw on half a season of "Ugly Betty", and that other guy who did 6 or 7 episodes of "House" and one of the lesser important people on "Lost". And that guy from SG1/DS9/Buffy/Beauty & the Beast was onscreen for nearly 5 minutes!

13 posted on 04/18/2011 6:56:04 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33

My husband, our daughter and I saw the movie. We LOVED it. Our daughter (28) was the youngest person in the theater, as far as we could see. It was very well made and stuck to the book. It didn’t take that much thinking to follow the plot. It was well worth the time and we will be getting the DVD as soon as it comes out.


14 posted on 04/18/2011 7:06:39 PM PDT by stansblugrassgrl (PRAISE THE LORD AND PASS THE AMMUNITION!!! YEEEEEHAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33

I just saw it this evening, and it was a good effort under the budgetary circumstances. John Galt’s lines were awful, and there was a little too much filler footage, but Hank and Dagney came across really well, as did Lillian Rearden, James Taggart and most of the rest. A little bit into it I started liking the fact that they were all no-names.


15 posted on 04/18/2011 7:19:05 PM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33

The one screen in pittsburgh had the 8:00 Friday show sold out by the Wednesday before. I had to get tix on fandango for the 5:50 show, which also was sold out by Friday. If it didn’t make much money it was only due to limited screens. I thought it was very well done.


16 posted on 04/18/2011 7:23:07 PM PDT by jdsteel (I like the way the words "Palin for President" make progressives apoplectic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33

I’d like to see it.

It’s not playing anywhere in my area. I’d have to drive to the murder capital of Phila, which is about 1 1/2 hours each way.

Or I’d have to get a bus to NYC for a 2 hr ride each way.

Hopefully, it will show up here...


17 posted on 04/18/2011 7:23:43 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33

My 18-year-old daughter insists on seeing it. We will have to drive about 120 miles to do so, but we will!


18 posted on 04/18/2011 7:47:01 PM PDT by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

mega dittoes


19 posted on 04/18/2011 7:53:28 PM PDT by LiteKeeper ("Psalm 109:8")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

I thoroughly enjoyed it. I usually don’t like to devote more than 22 minutes to a TV show or movie, but the 102 minutes flew by and left me wishing there was more. I’ll definitely see it again and give the DVD’s for Christmas.


20 posted on 04/18/2011 7:56:23 PM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson