Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

48÷2(9+3) = ?

Posted on 04/12/2011 1:32:09 PM PDT by grundle

Texas Instruments TI-85 says:

48÷2(9+3) = 2

But Texas Instruments TI-86 says:

48÷2(9+3) = 288



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: algebra; math; mdas; pemdas; texasinstruments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 661-670 next last
To: grundle

2.... math eggheads would solve the juxtaposed 2(9+3) first. Another way to express this would be (2(9)+2(3)).


161 posted on 04/12/2011 2:50:30 PM PDT by Tim n Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

2.... math eggheads would solve the juxtaposed 2(9+3) first. Another way to express this would be (2(9)+2(3)).


162 posted on 04/12/2011 2:50:30 PM PDT by Tim n Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
Multiplication and division (technically) have the same precedence, to my memory.

That is correct, so then they MUST be performed from left to right.

163 posted on 04/12/2011 2:50:40 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: meyer

It’s only the INSIDE of parenthesis that get precedence, not the outside.


164 posted on 04/12/2011 2:51:34 PM PDT by MortMan (What disease did cured ham used to have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: grundle
The rules are consistent, complete and there can be no ambiguity. There is actually none in this equation.

The equation is 48/2(9+3).

Evaluate the parenthesis first.

48/2*12

This equation is equivalent to:

48*1/2*12=48*0.5*12

NOTE: The original eq. is ≠ to:48/(2*12)
Multiplication and division have equivalent prevalence. The division operator acts on the multiplicand it procedes to produce the multiplicative inverse. ie. in this case "/2" = *1/2 = *0.5.

165 posted on 04/12/2011 2:51:51 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

How old are you?


166 posted on 04/12/2011 2:51:58 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

;)


167 posted on 04/12/2011 2:52:05 PM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

I love Java. It puts the Corn flakes on the table.


168 posted on 04/12/2011 2:52:25 PM PDT by isaiah55version11_0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: BoringGuy
That is the way you can build in an implied * to the equation

Nope, operators with equal precedence MUST be performed from left to right. You cannot arbitrarily use parenthesis that were not already there.

169 posted on 04/12/2011 2:52:25 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

Are you a liberal-in-training???

Administrator, please ZOT this - it may give the libs an idea they haven’t thought of.


170 posted on 04/12/2011 2:52:45 PM PDT by jda ("Righteousness exalts a nation . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: RikaStrom

I’ve never seen a rule that extended the parenthetical precedence outside the parenthesis.


171 posted on 04/12/2011 2:53:05 PM PDT by MortMan (What disease did cured ham used to have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: jda

If you did not like that one....what is 1 + 1?


172 posted on 04/12/2011 2:54:20 PM PDT by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
NOTE: The original eq. is ≠ to:48/(2*12)

Yes it is. How old are you?

173 posted on 04/12/2011 2:54:24 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: altsehastiin

Not according to my dear aunt Sally.


174 posted on 04/12/2011 2:54:48 PM PDT by Just Another Lurker (I'll go back to sitting in my corner now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tim n Texas
2.... math eggheads would solve the juxtaposed 2(9+3) first. Another way to express this would be (2(9)+2(3)).

You are correct - as I pointed out, the distributive property of multiplication dictates that this is true, since 2(9+3) = (2(9)+2(3))=24

175 posted on 04/12/2011 2:55:26 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri
BUT... once the () are calculated... you go back to left to right...

So, then you would have to finish the equation starting from the left.. get the answer.. then multiply the answer from the ()

LOL, don't know what to say on this one. I was taught that you cannot divide by a number that hasn't be equated first. This could be variations in the decades so to speak.

As I read the equation, the 2(9+3) is the entire equation that must be solved prior to moving back left to right. That 2(9+3) is the "other" number.

I'll go dig out my old algebra teachers' names and we can ask, if they are still alive. :-)

176 posted on 04/12/2011 2:55:26 PM PDT by RikaStrom (Pray for Obama - Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his place of leadership.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Post 135 explains why much better than I did


177 posted on 04/12/2011 2:56:23 PM PDT by BoringGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

<><><>If you did not like that one....what is 1 + 1?

Whatever the highest bidder who’s payment clears wants it to be :)


178 posted on 04/12/2011 2:56:50 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Sorry, but PRE calculator, the equation is thus..

_____48____
2(9+3) =


179 posted on 04/12/2011 2:56:59 PM PDT by gwilhelm56 (islam ... church of the Perpetually Offended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: RikaStrom

I suspect those who think the answer is 288 are far younger than those of us who know the answer is 2.


180 posted on 04/12/2011 2:57:25 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 661-670 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson