1 posted on
03/18/2011 2:19:41 PM PDT by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
03/18/2011 2:20:28 PM PDT by
decimon
To: decimon; KevinDavis
Just hurry up and development warp technology already!
3 posted on
03/18/2011 2:23:00 PM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: decimon
4 posted on
03/18/2011 2:26:22 PM PDT by
paulycy
(Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
To: decimon
I prefer to think of space-time as a bologna sandwich but, hey, if they want to think of it as a chess board - I say go for it!
5 posted on
03/18/2011 2:29:52 PM PDT by
2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
(Welcome to the USA - where every day is Backwards Day!)
To: decimon
Is matter ultimately an Idea?
7 posted on
03/18/2011 2:30:43 PM PDT by
AceMineral
(World peace is the hog slop of philosophy.)
To: decimon
8 posted on
03/18/2011 2:31:14 PM PDT by
evets
(beer)
To: decimon
Scientific research once was used to find answers. But it was discovered that finding answers doesn’t pay the bills nearly as well as finding questions does. Thus, that has become the goal of the scientific community. To find questions. IMHO.
9 posted on
03/18/2011 2:33:06 PM PDT by
TruthBeforeAll
(To a liberal, if an idea is a complete & utter disaster, it's only because there's not enough of it.)
To: decimon
14 posted on
03/18/2011 3:01:28 PM PDT by
dangerdoc
(see post #6)
To: decimon
It sounds absolutely fascinating; I just wish I knew what the heck they’re talking about.
To: decimon
The electrons in graphene move by hopping from carbon atom to carbon atom, as if hopping on a chessboard Given the carbon structure, perhaps more like Chinese Checkers?

18 posted on
03/18/2011 3:40:47 PM PDT by
mikrofon
(Nano, Nano)
To: decimon; SunkenCiv; Slings and Arrows; Lady Jag
To: decimon
To: decimon
“Well, Bobby, let’s see if Mr. Science can answer that question for you. ‘Is space like a chess board?’ What you have there is called an analogy. Is something like something else? In this case, I would say ‘no’. Space is more like a tunafish sandwich. Remember, all you members of The Mister Science Physics Forum are welcome to come and see me at the Harrison Avenue Mall this Saturday from noon to four where I’ll be demonstrating the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Free hot dogs, too!”
21 posted on
03/18/2011 3:53:34 PM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: decimon
Oh SNAP!

27 posted on
03/18/2011 4:41:51 PM PDT by
Daffynition
( DBKP ~ Death By 1000 Papercuts)
To: decimon
36 posted on
03/18/2011 7:35:08 PM PDT by
2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
(Welcome to the USA - where every day is Backwards Day!)
To: decimon
. First isolated in 2004 by Andre Geim and Kostya Novoselov, graphene has a wealth of extraordinary electronic properties, such as high electron mobility and current capacity. In fact, these properties hold such promise for revolutionary advances that Geim and Novoselov were awarded the 2010 Nobel Prize a mere six years after their achievement. Big deal! 0bama got his Nobel Prize 2 months into his Presidency, and hadn't (and still hasn't) done anything worthwhile! It still looks like it was for "being elected while black".
(extreme sarcasm)
39 posted on
03/18/2011 7:50:54 PM PDT by
airborne
(Paratroopers - Good to the last drop!)
To: decimon
And experiments show that the electron does not have a radius; it is thought to be a pure point particle with no surface or substructure that could possibly spin.Interesting. I didn't realize electrons were pure point particles. That means they must be indivisible, which means they must be infinitely dense. But density requires volume, which they lack, so maybe not. And yet they are particles so they must have mass. And if their mass is finite and their volume is zero, then we're back to infinite density. But that's not possible is it? Or is it?
To: decimon
45 posted on
03/18/2011 8:44:08 PM PDT by
PeteCat
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson