[Natufian]

Tread boldly

[Natufian]

GGG Ping!

[BigCinBigD]

the find was made by a Dr. Scholl’s, of The British museum.

[fortheDeclaration]

Arched feet, the discovery team tells the journal Science, are critical for walking the way modern humans do.

LOL!

[Daffynition]

A really, really old arch.

[count-your-change]

Fact is the “Lucy” skeleton is only about 80 bones and fragments of bones. No feet, no ankles, only one leg bone and a piece of a bone, No hands, only a few back vertebrae, in short a few a scraps that may not not even go together.

“Fossil find puts ‘Lucy’ story on firm footing”. Right. Soon we’ll even know it’s hair color whatever it was.

[Walkingfeather]

Ever notice how the desperation of scientists to find this non existent fossil record has a sort of Willy Loemanesque quality about it? This panicked desperation to believe something that just isn’t true?

[JSDude1]

This fossil proves nothing, it sure doesn’t give evidence that so called “lucy” is an human ancestor.

[JRios1968]

They got some esplainin’ to do

[Reeses]

could walk upright consistently - one of the major advances in human evolution.

Walking on two feet wasn't an advance, having to two free hands to wield weapons was. That combined with envy led to murder then tribal warfare, which is essentially the modulated evolutionary pressure that drives human brain development while leaving all other animals untouched. If it wasn't for envious leftists always trying to take our stuff we would still be eating grubs from a stick.

[wendy1946]

The Basic Non Evolution of Modern Man (for anybody including yourself who might have missed it)....

---

Then again there's the question of "Lucy", i.e. the question of "scientists" who find human footprints and a few monkey bones lying around in strata which they assume for ideological reasons to be 2,000,000 years old and, rather than draw the obvious conclusion that they've found evidence of a human with a pet monkey, assume they've found a monkey which had developed human-like feet.

[LiteKeeper]

Isn’t interesting, if a creationist cited such flimsy evidence, that person who be belittled and ridiculed. But an evolutionist can cite the same evidence and be lauded as brilliant!

[colorado tanker]

Lucy had happy feet?