Posted on 12/20/2010 10:46:41 PM PST by CanadianPete
Program Description
Most people imagine dinosaurs lurking in warm locales with swamps and jungles, dining on vegetation and each other. But "Arctic Dinosaurs" reveals that many species also thrived in the harsh environments of the north and south polar regions. NOVA follows two high-stakes expeditions and the paleontologists who push the limits of science to unearth 70 million-year-old fossils buried in the vast Alaskan tundra.
(Excerpt) Read more at pbs.org ...
Oh another thing, now that I remember. They show that due to continental drift one part of alaska was way further south but that another part of it was more or less where it is today. So the coral stuff would be from the further south part but the part that was still there had the dinosaurs apparently. I hope you will be able to watch it.
before I’d blame BP, I’d look at a combination of exceptionally low sunspot activity (theoretically, we’re supposed to be at a maximum right now, not a minimum as we are), La Nina effect and the general erratic behavior of the Gulf Loop for the past several years.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76sS7bqw9Z8
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5x8dJ57xkk
But that would imply that the world is not warmer than it has ever been. Can’t have that idea getting out.
no disrespect intended...I’ll call bullshit...it had to be equatorial to grow the corals.
aalso, beyond the plates shifting I’ll bet that there have been other contributing factors. Perhaps we have had other north south axis... suggesting that maybe the skin spun on the molten mas due to foreign impact as well as the continental drift.
For corals to grow most require around 80 degree water. To have that water warm to 80 then freeze, (killing the coral) is too tall a order for me to believe. Also thats a lot of water to move 90 to 120 degrees.
I might buy pieces of their argument....If I hadn’t been there, it might be different. Ise seen the ocean , mate, and walked dem shores.
I would question their editor and fact checkers to see if Team Obama and Eric Holder were involved.
The coral argument might work along with a shifting.... but if you go across the Arctic over to Coral Harbour.... and I know it doesnt look like much according to the maps... for the way they taper in.... but....Ellesmere Island is clear across the Canadian Arctic. What a person should do is go for a walk along Russias Arctic coast....and hunt for coral, sunglasses and swim suits. Dunno. Maybe there is other evidence. Maybee some beer bottles.
I’ll bet on the ocean there having equatorial temps, cuzz I have touched the coral in both places.
You state: “Birds, and reptillians, are the progeny supposedly.” In fact the dinosaurs were an offshoot of the reptilian line. Both continued to evolve and differentiate over time. For that matter, mammals separated and evolved at almost the same time as dinosours or perhaps a little earlier, although the great Permian extinction greatly weakened the mammalian line and allowed the dinosaurs to erupt on the world stage. The point is that by the time dinosaurs existed that were most likely warm blooded, many millions of years separated them from their cold blooded reptilian antecedents.
If the show was on Cable, I would not have been able to see it. With regard to how to ping someone, all you have to do is hit the Post Reply bloc on the comment space and enter their recipient name into the TO space. Another way is to go to Private Reply and send them a message from there. I hope this helps.
Regarding water going from 80 degrees to freezing. Aside from significant shifts in the earth’s crust, and tectonic plate movement, more sudden changes can occur because of very large boloid crashes or megavolcano events. Think the great Permian extinction or the end Cretacious event, not to mention the Toba megavolcano 74,000 years ago.
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe · |
|||
Antiquity Journal & archive Archaeologica Archaeology Archaeology Channel BAR Bronze Age Forum Discover Dogpile Eurekalert LiveScience Mirabilis.ca Nat Geographic PhysOrg Science Daily Science News Texas AM Yahoo Excerpt, or Link only? |
|
||
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · |
Earth in the BalanceFour-and-a-half billion years ago, an asteroid slammed into earth, knocking it onto its side and touching off a crazy climate that nurtured the first living things but later triggered giant ice sheets in the tropics.
by Jessica Gorman
April 1, 2000
Or so suggests Gregory Jenkins, a meteorologist at Pennsylvania State University. In Earth's infancy, 3.8 million to 2.5 billion years ago, its surface was warm enough for life even though the young sun was much fainter than it is today. Jenkins found he could explain the balmy temperatures if Earth had been rotating sideways at the time. Recently, geologists have found evidence of glaciers at Earth's equator between 800 million and 540 million years ago. When Jenkins modeled what the climate would have been like during that time if Earth's axis were tilted at a steep, 70-degree angle, ice appeared at the equator.
According to the theory, Earth remained off kilter until around the beginning of the Cambrian Period, 540 million years ago, when a buildup of continents near the south pole flipped our planet to its present 23-degree tilt. The switch to a less extreme climate could explain the remarkable diversification of life at that time. "This is radically different than what most of us think about Earth," Jenkins says.Scientific evidence supporting a Pole Shift:Palaeomagnetic results from lava flows recording a geomagnetic polarity reversal at Steens Mountain, Oregon suggest the occurrence of brief episodes of astonishingly rapid field change of six degrees per day. The evidence is large, systematic variations in the direction of remanent magnetization as a function of the temperature of thermal demagnetization and of vertical position within a single flow, which are most simply explained by the hypothesis that the field was changing direction as the flow cooled.
Researchers Find Evidence of Polar Waffling
R. S. Co*, M. Prévot& P. Camps
Nature 374, 687-692 (20 April 1995)Struggle Seen As Sun Switches Magnetic Field PolarityDuring solar maximum, when the Sun's activity is at a peak in its 11 year cycle, the polarity of its magnetic field changes: the north pole takes on the polarity of the south pole and vice versa. Now, for the first time ever, a spacecraft has witnessed this process from a front-row seat high above the Sun's south pole... Andre Balogh, from Imperial College, London, who is Principal Investigator for the Ulysses magnetometer, says: "In the past few months, the direction of the magnetic field observed by Ulysses fluctuated between the old and the new. Even now, there are periods when the old polarity is still present. Clearly, a struggle is going on in the Sun's magnetic field, with freshly emerging new polarity regions racing towards the polar regions, encountering the slowly decaying older polarity regions. We know that the new polarity will win through, but the battle is still on for another few months... The Sun's magnetism is very complex," adds Balogh. "Given this unique chance to sit by the ringside as the two magnetic polarities fight it out, Ulysses is once again able to make a significant step forward in our understanding of the Sun and the heliosphere."
UniSci
January 29, 2001
And BTW, since the European immigrants and the African immigrants are minor subsets of the source populations and come from different areas and have different genetics:
"The specifics [sic] are incompatible. The inability to crossbreed is an issue as well. No genetic pool to deal from. All must be inbred mutants."
Q.E.D. LSMFT!
Well, I hope you all enjoyed it.
In case you missed it they will be re-airing it. In my area, for instance, on Thursday Dec 23 at 11:30 pm. You should check your local PBS affiliate because the re-air times aren’t always the same for different affiliates. They usually differ by a day or two.
Finally, if you don’t have an affiliate, you can watch the video online. Just goto the link for the article. It is the page for the documentary and allows online viewing.
As a person who suffers from tobacco allergy, there is no such thing as Fine Tobacco. ;-)
Bummer!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.