Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Matter/Antimatter from the Vacuum
Centauri Dreams ^ | 12/10/10 | Paul Gilster

Posted on 12/10/2010 2:37:31 PM PST by LibWhacker

Matter/Antimatter from the Vacuum

by Paul Gilster on December 10, 2010

New work at the University of Michigan, now written up in Physical Review Letters, discusses the possibility of producing matter and antimatter from the vacuum. The idea is that a high-energy electron beam combined with an intense laser pulse can pull matter and antimatter components out of the vacuum, creating a cascade of additional particles and anti-particles. UM Engineering research scientist Igor Sokolov has this to say about the theoretical study:

“We can now calculate how, from a single electron, several hundred particles can be produced. We believe this happens in nature near pulsars and neutron stars…”

That would make the vacuum a lively place indeed, as Sokolov acknowledges:

“It is better to say, following theoretical physicist Paul Dirac, that a vacuum, or nothing, is the combination of matter and antimatter—particles and antiparticles.Their density is tremendous, but we cannot perceive any of them because their observable effects entirely cancel each other out.”

Of course, to produce these hundreds of particles from a single electron, we need not only an ultra-high-intensity laser beam but a two-mile long particle accelerator. But the model is intriguing. We’re deep in the realm of quantum electrodynamics (QED), which describes how electrically charged particles interact by exchanging photons. Richard Feynman called QED ‘the jewel of physics’ because of its predictive capabilities. Feynman’s QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter (1986) is based on a lecture series designed for the general public, and without it, those of us who are mathematically challenged wouldn’t have a chance with QED ideas.

Reading the Sokolov paper, I can see that it’s time for me to return to Feynman, or maybe this Wikipedia entry, which calls QED ‘a perturbation theory of the electromagnetic quantum vacuum,’ and goes on to provide a useful backgrounder on the theory’s evolution. But let’s say this: Normally, matter and antimatter destroy each other when they come into contact. The UM team is interested in how this annihilation may be averted under certain conditions. Thus Sokolov colleague John Nees:

“…in a strong electromagnetic field, this annihilation, which is typically a sink mechanism, can be the source of new particles. In the course of the annihilation, gamma photons appear, which can produce additional electrons and positrons.”

One experiment in the 1990s produced effects that the Sokolov paper calls ‘weak and barely observable,’ creating gamma photons and electron/positron pairs, but the new work suggests that ramping up the laser pulse intensity should produce a more definitive result. The UM team’s equations model how a sufficiently strong laser could cause the creation of more particles than were initially injected into the experiment through a particle accelerator. Sokolov again:

“If an electron has a capability to become three particles within a very short time, this means it’s not an electron any longer. The theory of the electron is based on the fact that it will be an electron forever. But in our calculations, each of the charged particles becomes a combination of three particles plus some number of photons.”

The HERCULES laser at the University of Michigan is one way to test this work in a small-scale laboratory setting, but a similar laser would have to be built at a particle accelerator like the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory at Stanford to work out all its implications, and because no such construction is planned, it may be some time before we can take these ideas forward. The team speculates that their theory may have applications for inertial confinement fusion — I bring this up particularly because of the interest of the Project Icarus team in ICF — but it’s a case of intriguing theory awaiting the experimental infrastructure to test it adequately.

The paper is Sokolov et al., “Pair Creation in QED-Strong Pulsed Laser Fields Interacting with Electron Beams,” Physical Review Letters Vol. 105, 195005 (2010) Abstract/Preprint. The paper is so dense in mathematics that I want to be sure to give you this news release as well.



TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: antimatter; catastrophism; matter; michigan; stringtheory; vacuum; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
If possible, this would be the most important discovery of all time (and that's the understatement of all time).
1 posted on 12/10/2010 2:37:35 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

This is not new. Matter/anti-matter particle fluctuations are a fairly mainstream understanding of ‘vacuum’. They need to be paired as such so energy is conserved. Some postulate that the entire Universe is one such fluctuation.


2 posted on 12/10/2010 2:41:46 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Matter/Antimatter from the Vacuum

Where else would it be?

3 posted on 12/10/2010 2:46:27 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (oy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmost

Never heard the Dirac quote before: That we live in an dense sea of particles and antiparticles, or that we could pull them out at will. Goodbye energy woes and goodbye to the need for a really good propulsion method that’d get us to the stars.


4 posted on 12/10/2010 2:48:32 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Are the new particles created from the photons... conservation of energy/mass from E = m * c^2?


5 posted on 12/10/2010 2:48:37 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

My vacuum gets a lot of matter in it. Have to empty it every time.


6 posted on 12/10/2010 2:49:45 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

So far all the antimatter we have has been made in particle colliders. So pulling it out of nothing would be a neat trick.


7 posted on 12/10/2010 2:52:33 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

I think the energy would come from what was previously the zero-point energy of the empty space (sometimes called vacuum energy). The theory is that even empty space (without even photons passing through) has a whole bunch of energy associated with it, but kind of equal and opposite, so it doesn’t seem to.


8 posted on 12/10/2010 2:53:34 PM PST by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

9 posted on 12/10/2010 2:55:42 PM PST by Pyro7480 ("If you know how not to pray, take Joseph as your master, and you will not go astray." - St. Teresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

Not from the photons per se. Rather the laser is used to free matter and antimatter from the quantum stew we’ve all heard so much about.


10 posted on 12/10/2010 2:56:16 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The concept is decades old. Casimir et al were exploring this theoretically in the first half of last century. Pulling real world usage out of random quantum fluctuations can no doubt be done, the random nature of the wavelengths/position/time/etc make it extremely difficult to convert to classical 'work'.
11 posted on 12/10/2010 2:57:00 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: allmost

12 posted on 12/10/2010 2:58:19 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Thats right...Tom Bearden et al.

Engery From the Vacuum

13 posted on 12/10/2010 2:59:51 PM PST by blasater1960 (Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

So nothing consists of unresolved somethings and everything consists of refracted nothing.


14 posted on 12/10/2010 3:04:00 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I think it’s been known for some time that the electron is really a fuzzy spot of energy that as we probe deeper into it we discover a cloud of virtual particles that makes us wonder if there is really an electron or just a motley collection of particles waiting to be expressed.


15 posted on 12/10/2010 3:04:25 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

Something from nothing?

Or maybe a vacuum is not “nothing?” Space is actually made of “ether” after all.


16 posted on 12/10/2010 3:04:39 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: allmost
No, there's nothing new about the quantum stew, but this is new work, just written up in Physical Review Letters describing a way to separate out matter and antimatter from the vacuum.
17 posted on 12/10/2010 3:07:16 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
However, the law of conservation has to still apply, doesn't it? So, if you are producing more matter than you started with, then the extra matter has to come from somewhere.

Fundamental law: you don't get nothin' for free.

18 posted on 12/10/2010 3:09:54 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
Fuzzy is a descriptive. Is it a particle or a wave and Heisenberg?
19 posted on 12/10/2010 3:15:29 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The amount of energy required to agitate the vacuum condition is enormous. Even with harnessing the virtual photons at relatively high efficiency, it seems like a power loss.


20 posted on 12/10/2010 3:15:55 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson