To: fishtank
What good would a cell phone do her before cell towers?
5 posted on
10/27/2010 2:25:42 PM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: R. Scott
Can you hear me now?
(I thought someone would have posted this by now)
11 posted on
10/27/2010 2:27:26 PM PDT by
Never on my watch
(Why does the Left think Muslims are going to behave as Christians?)
To: R. Scott
Again, I didn’t say I believe this.
I posted it because the best place to find an explanation is on FR.
The smartest people in America are here.
So, WHAT is it?
NOT, “it can’t be true, because of blah blah blah ....”
Tell me what it is.
It’s not a big deal, I would like to know what going on there.
13 posted on
10/27/2010 2:27:59 PM PDT by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: R. Scott
“What good would a cell phone do her before cell towers?”
Perhaps she is talking to cell towers that WILL be built nearby.
If you could transport matter through time, energy would certainly be a no brainer.
56 posted on
10/27/2010 2:45:42 PM PDT by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: R. Scott
An advanced civilization wouldn't need towers. It could have be similar to sat. phones, or any type of communications device. The stranger questions are: Why her, why then, why there, why use such a device in public. Doesn't make any sense.
Perhaps some guy had the idea of people being able to communicate in such a manner long before it was ever realized and staged the shot. Yet it is so arcane and out of place, and so minute that to even fake such a thing for some obscure idea is ridiculous.
I will say he/she (and it's clearly dressed as a dumpy, obese, elderly female wearing size 14 shoes) does in deed seem to be talking and talking INTO some device which is clearly being held up to her ear for convenience. Very bizarre.
68 posted on
10/27/2010 2:58:18 PM PDT by
Doc Savage
(Stay Thirsty My Friend!!)
To: R. Scott
Maybe it was a Progresso can. They had string.
To: R. Scott
80 posted on
10/27/2010 3:09:40 PM PDT by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: R. Scott
I think a time traveler could handle the problem of ‘phone towers’... they’ll be gone in 30 years....
112 posted on
10/27/2010 3:42:49 PM PDT by
GOPJ
('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
To: R. Scott
It just looks like a cell phone...she’s calling the mother ship.
To: R. Scott
If, and that of course is a huge if, there were such a thing as time travels or others who were advanced beyond what we know about the times that wanted to stay in contact with each other who is to say that they didn't also have in place whatever it took to communicate with each other. Also, maybe they were in some kind of warp that overlapped each other so that the satellite rays entered through. The idea of a time traveler is so remote that if the tech existed we may not understand what else may exist with it. We don't actually know nearly all that we think we do.
168 posted on
10/27/2010 6:15:32 PM PDT by
Bellflower
(All meaning is in The LORD.)
To: R. Scott; Slings and Arrows; Revolting cat!; JoeProBono; 537cant be wrong; Aeronaut; ßuddaßudd; ..
What good would a cell phone do her before cell towers?
She has the next generation of cellphone technology. Doesn't require towers.
The REAL answer is just as interesting. She IS a time traveller but that's a little transistor radio she's jamming to. 23 skidoo!
215 posted on
10/28/2010 8:56:28 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson