Your posts may be mushing together . . . trying to get out the door but not succeeding very well. LOL.
re:
As for the claims of electrical interference, the cases you cited, if even true, are merely examples of what Mr. Carlson is claiming is physically true, that is, that if electronics are disrupted by natural or physically explainable events, then all electronics will be disrupted, not merely one component, or one station, etc.
The only case that may be worthy of further investigation would be the claim that “targeting instructions for individual missiles have been changed”. In such further investigation, one should ask, “was only one missile at the time altered, while others in the same test flight operated normally, or, was only one missile tested at the time of the malfunction?” If the latter case, then that would simply be another case of system wide malfunction, and not targeted malfunction (which would be unexplainable by the laws of physics).
FROM MEMORY . . . not refreshed in great detail for many months if not a few years . . .
1. The missiles were all extremely structurally and physically isolated. I was reportedly virtually impossible if not totally redundantly impossible for one missile’s malfunction to influence another missle.
2. IIRC, even at the control center level, there was so much redundancy built in . . . and so much isolated structure built into the control center wiring and programming, EVEN AT THAT LEVEL, it was still essentially impossible for a system wide failure to occur.
3. NEVERTHELESS, in at least a few such incidents, as many as 10 missiles went kaput instantly at essentially the same time.
4. In other incidents as was verified and discovered afterwards . . . MISSILE TARGETING DATA WERE CHANGED. THAT IS, MISSILES THAT WERE TARGETED FOR SAY MOSCOW OR BEIJING WERE CHANGED TO TARGET INSTEAD ________ THE CHANGES HAVE NEVER BEEN REVEALED—TO WHAT INSTEAD—ONLY THAT SUCH CHANGES DID OCCUR. It is not clear if the missiles were retargeted for the middle of the ocean or for different inhabited areas or even perhaps for our own cities. THAT information has never been disclosed, that I’m aware of. This was done on an individual missile basis. Very incredible technologies involved.
5. BTW, UFO’s have long persistently demonstrated intelligent controlled responsiveness to THOUGHTS of observers from 10’s of miles away. That is, the observer would THINK—go left. The UFO would go left; go up; go right; blink 3 times etc. and the UFO would behave accordingly.
Ok thanks. I do not see how these claims refute the initial criticism, to whit, that electronic failure can be explained by natural/man made causes. They all, again, seem to be cases of system wide failure, either in individual missiles or missiles in a group. Except of course, the targeting coordinate change. For that, I would like to see supporting documentation if you have the time, for reasons posted in my post # 526.