Ok thanks. I do not see how these claims refute the initial criticism, to whit, that electronic failure can be explained by natural/man made causes. They all, again, seem to be cases of system wide failure, either in individual missiles or missiles in a group. Except of course, the targeting coordinate change. For that, I would like to see supporting documentation if you have the time, for reasons posted in my post # 526.
Let me put it this way.
1. The systems were so isolated and independent as to not at all be accurately described as
one system.
2. There had never been ANY OTHER KIND OF INFLUENCE OF ANY KIND FROM THE BUILDING OF THE SYSTEMS TO THEIR RETIREMENT of any remotely ‘system wide’ failure. Just didn’t happen. Was structurally impossible.
3. The ONLY time multiple missiles failed in anything like the same time frame was when the UFO craft were dinking around with them.
4. What is your explanation for that?
Mr Carlson’s explanation just doesn’t match the facts as I’m convinced they were.
that electronic failure can be explained by natural/man made causes.
As I understand their archetecture, structure, operations, design and history etc. that’s just . . .
NOPE. NOT PLAUSIBLE. NOT BY A HUGE MARGIN.
There was just tooooo much fail-safe redundancy built-in.
And the record of the equipment’s performance confirms that.