Posted on 06/25/2010 9:43:42 AM PDT by Polarik
Sometime between October 31, 2008, and July 27, 2009, the dates of Health Director Chiyome Fukino's two press releases, Hawaii amended Obama's birth record. A brand-new Certificate of Live Birth (not Certification of Live Birth) was issued to him.
The DOH Director decides what goes in or gets taken out of birth records. She went on record as saying that "President Obama posted a copy of his certificate on his campaign website" even though she has refused to authenticate it for the past two years. This created a conundrum that could only be resolved by changing Obama's birth records to match what is in that online copy - which is a stone-cold forgery, and Fukino knows it!
That forged COLB also has its origin within the DOH: watch the video to find out the shocking truth as to whose COLB was used for the forgery.
You'll also realize that you've been staring at a forgery this whole time and not realizing that the most obvious sign of it was right there under your noses.
Not only did Obama get a new birth certificate, the certificate itself was designed with him in mind as Rev. 10/08 - coincidentally, the date of Fukino's first press release (10/31/08). Hawaii ditched the old Certification of Live Birth and switched to a hybrid form called a Certificate of Live Birth - formerly the name of the long-form birth certificate.
Say, "Aloha" to Obama's new COLB (Certificate of Live Birth):
Click on the thumbnail for a full-size copy
In Obama's COLB, you can clearly see the date stamp "resting" on top of the background pattern, and not coming through from the other side. A few folks at HotAir also zeroed in on the "busted-up 6" in June 6, 2007 - meaning the JPG blocking was different from the rest of the image.
I have a video showing how the date-stamp, Seal, and registrar's stamp were all added to the front side as separate layers.
Here's a real 2007 COLB. you can see the date-stamp showing through the paper. You can also see the Registrar's stamp showing through the paper about the same amount as the date-stamp - this is the way it should be. The Registrar's stamp on Obama's COLB was far less visible: although you can see traces of the "h" in PhD, the block of text on the Registrar's stamp is illegible.
LOL. Just as I suspected. Our resident Freeper "expert" with a phony Ph.D., who's made it his life's journey to expose COLB fraud, has himself committed fraud!
I love irony!
LOL. I was thinking it it matched the print on the Kenyan cert. he could be.
How did it get “fixed”?
Obama had two Muslim daddys and three Muslim names. You would have thunk his mother would have gotten a shot at his first or middle name.
However, there is one problem with it, and I'd like to see how many of you can spot it. Heck, I'll even give Curiosity a shot at it.
Good luck!
Click on thumbnail
The document says Hawaii under island of birth...if the Commie-Muzzie Kenyan Usuper was born in Honolulu, would not the island be Oahu?When I clicked on the link to the jpg, it had changed to Oahu.
Absolutely. And the county is shown as "Hawaii" and that should be "Honolulu" since that's the name of the county Oahu is in. This whole thing stinks.When I first opened the jpg, it did say Hawaii under County of Birth. After your post #73 where you said "FIXED", I refreshed the image, it now shows Honolulu as the County of Birth.
What kind of a hoax are you trying to perpetrate here?
I called “Tech Support” and they got right on it.
You might remember this thread from July 28, 2009 (you are cited): Clearing the Smoke on Obamas Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigators June 10 Report.
At the bottom of the report, we get to this section:
July 11th Addendum to Report-PJ1. Until June 2009, the reasonable doubts about where Obama was born could have quickly and finally been resolved if he had authorized the release by the Hawaiian Dept of Health of his original birth certificate or else applied for it himself and released it to the media. But as these doubts have increased and reached the point where they are no longer a fringe phenomenon, the Hawaiian state govt has recently taken certain steps that would create procedural and possibly legal barriers to a resolution of the controversy. Given the slipperiness that characterized the statements of Chiyome Fukino, the Depts Director, and Janice Okubo, the Depts spokesperson, to the media on this issue, it is, I think, also reasonable to regard these steps with suspicion.
A family that I am acquainted with has a child who was born in Hawaii 6 months ago. They filled out and mailed in a form to the Dept of Health, as did their doctor. In return the Dept sent them in the first week of June, 2009, the same abbreviated computer-generated form that last year on the Daily Kos and subsequently on the Obama campaign web site was called a Certification of Live Birth. The form that this family received this year is identical in format to the Certification of Live Birth on the Daily Kos web site with one exception: the title at the top of the form.
On June 12, 2008 the title for this abbreviated form was Certification of Live Birth. The title for the form that this family received in the first week of June 2009 is Certificate of Live Birth. I called The Dept of Health and confirmed that the title of the form had been changed. The bureaucrat that I spoke to said the change had been made recently, but could not or would not tell me when. Sometime between June 12, 2008 and the first week of June 2009 the Hawaiian Dept of Health changed the title of this abbreviated form from Certification of Live Birth to Certificate of Live Birth. Why?
The use of the word Certificate rather than Certification makes the form feel somewhat more like a traditional birth certificate than the Certification of Live Birth that the Daily Kos website and subsequently the Obama campaign posted on the Internet even though, like the Certification, it also lacks any information about the hospital, doctor, or midwife. There is no footprint etc. This renaming of the document will be very convenient for the Hawaiian Dept of Health in future stonewalling should any legal pressure be brought against them to produce Obamas Certificate of Live Birth. Instead of producing the original Certificate of Live Birth, they will produce the abbreviated Certification of Live Birth form that the Dept of Health has now renamed a Certificate of Live Birth and claim that they are doing so in accordance with state policies and procedures in the words of the Depts Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino.
But whether it is called (as it was last year) a Certification or (as it is now) a Certificate of Live Birth this abbreviated document provides none of the probative information that was or wasnt on Barack Obamas original Certificate of Live Birth. Unlike the Certificate of Live Birth of the time when Barack Obama was born, this new Certificate of Live Birth provides no real evidence of where a child was born or indication of where such evidence might be found. It provides no information that would demonstrate to the people of the United States whether there is convincing evidence that he was actually born here or whether a relative or two (or possibly even Barack Obama himself) just made a statement to that effect to a low level bureaucrat. (As is permitted under Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii.)
Thanks
Interesting video. So there are five women that we know of who are in on this. My question is, have they been bought off with small, or maybe big, fortunes, or have they received mortal threats if they don’t shut up? How many people are there anyway who know about this fraud? How are they keeping their silence, even though it’s destroying this country?
“What kind of a hoax are you trying to perpetrate here?”
A demonstration, not a hoax.
I saw Air Force 1 on the tarmac in Toronto this afternoon and was excited at the sight
but then I remembered the POS it brought in with it and the thrill faded.
“The form that this family received this year is identical in format to the Certification of Live Birth on the Daily Kos web site with one exception: the title at the top of the form.”
clearly, this guy has no visual acuity.
We know the Obama campaign released the first one.
So this is an official Hawaii release? When did it come out?
Wouldn't the bamster have to authorize the release of it?
Sorry for being slow but I'm still a bit confused.
“They are the top gun of counterintell.,”
Polish jokes aside........ Somewhere I read that the Polish have always been considered to have the best intel services in the world.... Tom Clancy?
Can anyone verify this?
So. What’s the provenance of this new October 2008 document? Who ordered it from the Health Department? How did it fall into your hands? How do we know you are not just a vexatious poster with Photoshop skills?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.