A study: The temperature rise has caused the CO2 Increase, not the other way around

Whats Up With That? ^ | June 9, 2010 | Guest post by Lon Hocker

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

A commonly seen graph illustrating what is claimed to be a causal correlation between CO2 and temperature, with CO2 as the cause. (Image courtesy Zfacts.com)

Abstract

Differentiating the CO2 measurements over the last thirty years produces a pattern that matches the temperature anomaly measured by satellites in extreme detail.    That this correlation includes El Niño years, and shows that the temperature rise is causing the rise in CO2, rather than the other way around.  The simple equation that connects the satellite and Mauna Loa data is shown to have a straight forward physical explanation.

Introduction

The last few decades has shown a heated debate on the topic of whether the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere is causing rising temperatures.  Many complex models have been made that seem to confirm the idea that anthropological CO2 is responsible for the temperature increase that has been observed.  The debate has long since jumped the boundary between science and politics and has produced a large amount of questionable research.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Another meat filled article.

[UAConservative]

And I now present: Charles' Law!

P1/T1=P2/T2

Which means if you raise the temperature (T2), the partial pressure of CO2 (P2) will also increase.

The flat-earthers don't want you to actually study science.

[mylife]

I have been saying for years, warmer temps lead to increased growth of vegetation and increased sustenance for critters as well as humans.

Thats a lot more CO2.
Temp leads C02 therefore CO2 is a function of temp, not the converse.

[Marine_Uncle]

Thanks again Ernest. I bookmarked WUWT link. Then read through the featured article.
What bugs me is the criminals across the globe that still want to in any way tax, punish industries for in some way exhuasing CO2 within their industrial processes etc., continue to not be barned stormed out of the arena and then at minimum, tarred and feathered.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

The Globalist want the money...

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

The Globalists want the money...

[Marine_Uncle]

But of course my friend. That is a given. He who controls the money controls the world.

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[cogitator]

Ernest, this is totally wrong. What's more, a posting by the respected Willis Eschenbach at Watts Up With That? SHOWS why it's wrong. I can't understand why Mr. Watts would bother to so confuse the issue by posting this.

Eschenbach's piece:

Some people claim there's a human to blame

When the skeptics are getting it right on a skeptical site, I have to admire them. But what's the point of posting crap? I don't get that. Poster BobN in the comments thread echoes my thoughts. There are several other comments that raise important contravening points. NO ONE should believe that this posting has any connection with reality. Repeat, NO ONE.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks Ernest_at_the_Beach. This was found to be the case in study of ice cores from Antarctica done back in the 1990s. Glaciers melted, the stuff that had been covered and frozen rotted, and various other biological activity increased -- and with it, the CO2 level.

· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·