That would explain a lot.
I think Pat’s religous views cause a lot of this, just sayin’
LOL@the title
Has anyone actually seen the two in the same room at the same time? Just sayin...
A blinding flash of the obvious.
Neah. Levin got this wrong.
Like a stopped clock, Pat Buchanan is right twice a day.
Helen Thomas is never right.
Pat’s sister looks fine to me.
Wait until he finds out his friend Bob Beckel defends her odious views.
Dick Morris hit his head last week and came up with something useful:
(Paraphrasing, I think)
“If the Palestinians lay down their arms, there is peace. If Israel lays down her arms, there is no Israel.”
Even a Catholic gal like me knows how heinous that is.
Funniest response about Helen Thomas’s anti-Israel comment:
“A furor has erupted...” - Laura Ingraham (probably unintentionally)
That’s not right. Pat has written some intelligent commentary here and there. And Pat’s voice won’t make your ears bleed.
Dear Mark,
you’re probably not reading this, but if you are, my request is to please find a different guest host than Mark Simone?
In my opinion he is a smug smartaleck who sounds like he has a mouthful of potatoes.
He called Ed Rendell a good guy, gave Paul McCartney a pass, and argued when a caller suggested Obama was either or a Muslim sympathizer, and even poo-poohed the fact that Obama kissed up to Muslim nations.
The guy is a joke in my opinion. He adds very little valuable information, and has all the intellectual heft of some drunk lecturing at a bar.
Thanks.
I don’t look to Pat Buchanan for foreign policy advice, just as I don’t look to Jorge Bush for domestic policy advice.
Which is not to say that either of these gentlemen do not have anything to offer in other spheres.
Buchanan is right, very right, on immigration and the demographic population bomb in our country. I agree with him on this. I disagree with him on some of his foreign policy stances.
I also don’t follow Levin lockstep, though I agree with him on several issues.
But let the rough and tumble continue. We’re better off to have the debates on the various issues than to have to be be silenced by some party orthodoxy.