Posted on 05/31/2010 9:46:47 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative
“Didn’t say that, but I guess you’re wound too tight today with your anti-Palin snark to understand that.”
Throwing up Baldwin as an excuse is not right Lakeshark. Only a couple of FReepers voted for that guy, out of what, 150,000?
When you do that you deserve what I posted ;-)
Go preach to your little band of malcontents, heck there's at least a dozen of you.
And talk about absurd, you're one of the best around for hyperbole.
That comment made sense to them or they wouldn’t have typed it and hit send. This is one of the people who are backing Palin no matter what, defending her no matter what.
Does that make one person want to join them? No, it makes people want to run from them.
Thus it is clear, these folks are destroying the very person they say they adore. Now that is a sad twisted reality to be sure.
What a shameless jerk. What where folks supposed to think, reading that comment addressed to me? You wrote it in a manner to provide plausible denial to you, but the effect was the same as if you had said I voted for him. You implied I was the type that would.
So what this reveals is that you are just a disinformation hack, startled that someone called you on something you thought you had insulated yourself against.
There’s no chance that’s going to happen when you post trash like that to me, you prick.
Even worse is we don't really even have any candidates yet. We only have potential candidates that stick to favorable situations that tell us nothing about what they would do as president. Even when they do finally officially run they dodge any difficult questions and come up with happy smiley faced answers. Mccain was going to cut every-ones taxes(when he traditionally opposed tax cuts) , Obama would pay for everything free health care, education, bringing back jobs by taxing the rich and leaving Iraq. It was clearly nonsense yet the horse-race environment created a fog to make it look like something serious was really being debated or that they had serious positions.
If someone builds up any live person to an unrealistic hero figure they will suffer the pain of having others drawn to bring them down and they will. GWB was that larger than life hero many years ago and it didnt end pretty.
You're such a drama queen, just back away from the keyboard and count to 10, it really might help.
I didn’t vote for Chuck Baldwin. You posted that comment to me. It was an example of hyperbole.
LakeShark, do you have a mental disability?
They're not afraid of her running because they believe that she could be easily defeated.
Exactly right. It’s the reason why folks are teeing off on the whacked out variety of Palin supporters these days.
A great example of hyperbole, you make it sound like that's a common attitude, and I'm betting you can't find many posts that say that out of the tens of thousands, heck I'm not even sure you can find one.
But that's typical of your rhetoric. Pure unadulterated hyperbole.
You inferred I said that about you, and have been going off on your drama queen idiocy ever since.
I find that scary as well. Partisanship is fine until it turns you into a moron. I've seen it countless times amongst people of all political stripes.
I pride myself on being fair and reasonable. I can be against Obama politically all day long and not believe that he's a muslim or homosexual. I can oppose his entire administration (and I do) without caring about his wife's fashion sense or the size of her rear end.
You left out drama queen, in this post, you know the one where you try to frame me as a practitioner of hyperbole.
Well you’re still using phrases like...
pure unadultrated hyperbole (even though you are the only one proven to be guilty of it)
drama queen (even though you are acting the part of one here)
rhetoric (even though I’ve directly addressed people’s comments on this thread)
So stupefyingly ignorant doesn’t seem all that far off to me.
Once again, do you have a mental illness? You sure don’t seem to understand what your posts look like to others.
But I'm not surprised.
You also need to understand what I was commenting on with my Baldwin comment, which was your post, it had nothing to do with your vote. I have no idea who you voted for.
You could have taken care of that comment a whole lot differently, yes?
I don’t really feel the need to respond to your thin or non-existent charges on point. Other people here recognize you for what you are.
You aren’t capable of arguing on the point, so you utilize charges of using hyperbole, or acting like a drama queen, or using worthless rhetoric.
You post stuff on the forum to tarnish others because you can’t defend the indefensible. You use hyperbole to charge others with it. And when called on all this, you just continue to trash the person who recognizes you for what you are.
You are by design, necessity, or blind ignorance a disinformation specialist. You do anything you can to move people off the point that your infatuation is misguided. You insult them, you post lies about them, or you call them names so that they will not continue to point out what a flawed whack-job you are, and that your candidate has made some serious miscalculations.
You’re not surprised... as if I care. You’re not surprised because you don’t really care as long as you can keep people fighting with you, rather than pointing out what you and your candidate have done, and continue to do.
Palin continues to back one of the worst Republicans of the last fifty years. You continue to trash folks who call her on it. Nobody is being fooled by your disrespect for wholesome values and Conservatism.
Now, call me Drama Queen and continue to emply hyperbole to charge me with using it. After all FakeSnark, that’s all you’ve got.
I've been awaiting your examples.
All I hear is *crickets*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.