Posted on 03/04/2010 9:31:50 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
Yep, that's something I think about every day...
In a CCW class I took, the VERY experienced instructor cautioned that it is a bit of a myth to assume the bad guys are all lousy shots...in reality they often practice a lot.
Все наблюдают это.
I’ll post to you since you make a lot of sense.
Center mass is too low according to modern medicine. I lost a lot of points by shooting center mass during an IDPA match where the target were covered by tshirts. IDPA targets have the “A” zone at the sternum. I learned a valuable lesson the easy way.
--best bullet performance I ever had was on a medium sized buck antelope with a .223 at about 60 yds, full tilt, sideways to me. At the shot, he pinwheeled down and never moved a muscle.Partner and I got there and to our surprise there was no visible wound. ( I knew I hadn't scared him to death.) When we got him open there was a quarter inch section of rib gone with the lung area totally pulped--instant death--
“Center mass is too low according to modern medicine.”
In the 1920s-1950’s center of mass was used to indicate the abdomen. Over the years it moved higher to the chest area. The rationale was to increase the probablity of hitting either the heart or lungs which immediately stops blood flow or fill the lungs with blood respectively.
Interesting.
Oh, c'mon now, you've been on here almost ten years, and you have to ask???
The writer is incorrect about some things,,,
Size does matter,,,
Ammo type does matter,,,
Shot placement(S) do matter,,,
The Moro Rebellion showed that the .45 cal. was needed to
take out somebody at close range that was going to kill
the US troops,,,
I keep the first 4 in my 1911 loaded with 230gr.HP’s the
last 4 are 230gr. ball ammo,,,3 extra mags of ball,,,
At home my Mossberg is loaded with Flechette rounds,,,
Shoot till the bad guy quits moving,,,
Then put a few more in the head...
>>In a CCW class I took, the VERY experienced instructor cautioned that it is a bit of a myth to assume the bad guys are all lousy shots...in reality they often practice a lot.<<
I think that is the best way stay live — expect him to get you if you miss...
Wow — the American entrepreneurial spirit never fails...
I usually omit the /sarcasm, when not on Birther threads. But you did say that one's opponents would "most likely" be wearing body armor. That seems to me to be a less than 1/1000 chance.
You were fine until the last comment and then you got carried away. You’re not an Oklahoma druggist, are you?
You were fine until the last comment and then you got carried away. Youre not an Oklahoma druggist, are you?
~~~
Nope,,,
IMHO : If you are in a fight for your life when you put
the bad guy down make damned sure that you Kill him,,,
“No Second Place Winner” is a good read if you can find it.
Bill Jordan gave me some pointers when I was a little kid,,,
Mr.Bill(RIP)told me this himself,,,
J.E.Clark was another one of my teachers,,,
Harold Terry was another,,,
DS Roberts was another,,,(US ARMY),,,
Last/First/Best teacher was my Dad,,,
All were World Class gunfighters/shooters,,,
I lived through the ‘Nam because of those Men,,,(67~68),,,
No we ain’t no “Oklahoma druggist” whatever that is...
Well, I've actually been being a little facetious, especially given certain FReepers' tendencies towards LEOs....however, there does seem to be an uptick over the past few years in crooks who invade homes claiming to be police, and wearing a lot of the gear, including body armour. Not exceedingly common (yet) but becoming more so.
That's it. That's the entire goal that people lose sight of. I had it told to me as "don't stop shooting when you think the bad guy's dead -- you stop shooting when _he_ thinks he's dead".
That principle holds whether you're using a gun, baseball bat, hands and feet, whatever.
The camera can do a tight closeup and frame both the gun and the actor's face in the same shot.
Interesting,
I thought the article was 100% about “it doesn’t matter where you hit them”, and that you still have to have a lucky shot to shut someone down.
The tactical thinking behind the highly expandable rounds (frangible or otherwise) is that soft tissue damage is deep and vastly widespread as compared to simply punching small holes (from FMJ or hollow point) in your attacker.
The concept of the frangible rounds or fragmenting rounds is that as they penetrate shortly below the skin the soft tissue damage is magnified by a huge amount.
Take a look on line and compare what the rounds to do ballistics gel.
The round I could care less about, but I would rather the first couple shots shred instead of poke holes (like standard rounds) and hope one of them hits a vital organ.
of course, just opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.