Replies

You are relying on copies of copies. This is a very, very bad copy. There are all sorts of artifacts that are introduced simply by this alone. All of the pixel weirdness is produced by this, not by Photoshop.

Also, you can't even say that the color of one right pantleg is purple. That color also matches someone else's skin on his neck and it also matches the shadowed area of the other pant leg.

The former claim that this guy was wearing two different shoes is also bogus. You see decorations on the inside of the right shoe, but you can't see anything on the outside of the left shoe. Big deal. There's no universal law in shoe manufacturing that outside decorations have to match inside decorations. And for that matter, you can't see the inside part of the left shoe anyway.

As far as Barry's right hand is concerned, a photo is a thin slice of time. If he was moving his thumb as the guy took the picture, you could get something like this. Remember Election with Reese Witherspoon and how the camera was able to freeze-frame certain really, really awkward, dorky, stupid looking expressions that were simply part of normal movement but which are not noticed because they go by so quickly? There is nothing in Barry's hand position that is anything more extreme or unusual than that.

As for the claim that the guy with the donkey shirt has either two different sleeves or a withered arm. Sheesh, that side of his body is in shadow next to the other guy. And you see only a portion of his arm hanging down because it's behind the woman in front of him. The thin width that you see isn't the only portion of his arm that exists.

As far as the claim that the donkey shirt guy is "wearing dark clothes intended to obfuscate the compiled abnormalities which cannot be hidden by other means," do you really mean to put yourself into such a position? Since he is standing BEHIND everyone, the darkness of his clothing cannot hide anything of anyone else. And if this was a composite photo of preexisting photos, then how did he choose anything to "intend" what the creator of the supposed composite photo wanted to accomplish at a date later than when the original photographs were taken?

the one photo that there is no doubt that has a problem is the floating hand on the park bench with his grandparents. I would like to see the original story with this picture to see if it looks the same.

You are relying on copies of copies. This is a very, very bad copy. There are all sorts of artifacts that are introduced simply by this alone.

Given when these photos were taken, they were actual photos that were scanned. The scanning will distort a picture, and the further in the past they were scanned, the worse it would be.