[ImperialistDaddy]

Once censored for attacking FOX News for being watered down conservatism, and now twice censored for simply trying to link a source to some revealing info. Not up in arms yet, but feeling pushed...

[Crim]

IBTZ!

[BADROTOFINGER]

Put a sock in it. This isn't your site. You don't get to do whatever you want. No one is abridging your freedom of speech.

Fox News is presenting watered down conservatism. So what? They present full blown liberals too. They are a news organization. They present a lot of things. You don't get to control that either. Get over it...JFK

[smokingfrog]

Don’t like it?

Start your own website then.

[dalereed]

“but feeling pushed... “

waiting for the big shove????

[parsifal]

I have been here for over 10 years and have found most of what is not allowed is for a pretty good reason. Credibility is important, and the people who own the site are the best to judge what reduces their credibility.

I am a conservative, but on economic matters, I am a whole lot more progressive than most here. So much that I am routinely called a socialist libtard troll. Yet, I have not been censored. There have been some sites I could not post from, but some of those were just plain wierdo sites, and the others were big publishers who do not permit their sites to be posted on here.

I would suggest you relax and hang out and not get your undies in a wad until you have been here for a while.

parsy, who isn’t a libtard troll

[Rick_Michael]

Is this really worth posting....?

[TNdandelion]

You’re doing it wrong.

[nralife]

“I got a message saying the source was not welcome on FreeRepublic.”

Exactly. And it wouldn’t make any difference who tried to post an article from it. It’s not just you...

[The Cajun]

Just have a seat please, someone will be along momentarily to take your order.

[JohnLongIsland]

pretty good almost ten minutes and no zot

[Gator113]

Try decaf.

[canuck_conservative]

First, remember that FR is privately-owned. We are allowed to make article and comment contributions - indeed, that’s the success of this site - but, in the end, the owner has the final say.

That said, I am generally in favor of open discussion, provided it’s clean and tasteful ( no promoting crime, etc.) Better to “jaw-jaw” etc.

Of course, due to past incidents, the Mods probably find it simpler just to ban certain sources (Wikipedia, for example).

BTW, you’re not the only one to experience this. :-)

[Enchante]

" I can easily take these issues straight to conservatives who do not feel that Club GOP represents conservatism on the Internet with my web development skills."

and no one here is stopping you.... FR has to protect itself in both legal and credibility terms -- I don't know about that site, and I can't begin to examine every web and media outlet to see what *I* think should be on here or not, but if it bothered me a lot I could always go and start my own website or blog...... this is not *my* site.... and I think FR does a darned good job of trying to protect itself and keep a great conservative forum going here

[An.American.Expatriate]

This post should be:

[BobL]

“I tried to expose the censorship on FreeRepublic against conservatives that apparently exists if you do not bow to the current politicians in power and owe your loyalty to the now less than conservative Republican party.”

I can name a dozen Republicans, starting with McCain who would disagree with your above statement - and you might want to see the comments about those people.

You simply have this site confused with another site.

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

...;0)

[An.American.Expatriate]

Oh, and I forgot - you may need more of this:

[papasmurf]

You should feel honored that Mr. Robinson took his valuable time and offered you an explanation. Consider yourself an esteemed minority here for that, alone.

Kudos to JohnRob! (although ImperialistDaddy didn’t deserve the kindness)

So, you consider yourself to be head and shoulders above any of us in your Conservatism, do ya’? And, yet, you make a comparison of “a two-bit haircut in a black and white movie” to Ronald Reagan? Pfftt!

I am want to call you names, many names. None of them nice, or repeatable in mixed company or where children are present. But, I won’t. You’d only enjoy it.

Now, be gone, impostor, your ambrosia is overwhelming.

[parsifal]

343 views??? OMG are there that many of us awake at this hour?

parsy, who is about to keel over

[Minn]

I would love to hear why this one is censored.

Because this is a respectable place. The owner, and the vast majority of don't appreciate stupid ass conspiracy theories that waste page space and band width; in addition to making us all look like kooks.

We're all happy that you make Ronald Reagan look like a piker in the conservatism department. I'm sure there's some Lyndon LaRouche site that will welcome you with open arms.