Posted on 01/24/2010 5:21:43 AM PST by debka
The principle of Universal Jurisdiction has been, and continues to be, an important tool in the legal practitioners tool box and an essential means of achieving justice for international crimes. Unfortunately, the principle has also become a political device employed for far more cynical means and far less noble purposes. In the early 1960s, Israel was one of the first states to invoke the principle of universal jurisdiction in its groundbreaking trial against Adolf Eichmann, the architect of the Holocaust.
(Excerpt) Read more at jcpa.org ...
That’s a rather long read. Care to summarize? Or what’s your point in posting this? I see you just joined today. Welcome, I guess.
In the early 1960's, Israel was one of the first states to invoke the principle of universal jurisdiction in its groundbreaking trial against Adolf Eichmann, the "architect of the Holocaust".In the post-WWII years, British intelligence hunted down and killed a number of former Nazis who were involved in various wartime projects not deemed worthy of war crimes prosecution.
Yes, I believe it was cynically referred to as "rendering the individual into Her Majesty's permanent custody".
It is also the foundation for James Bond's "License to Kill"
Best regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.