To: Federalist Patriot
Seven-Year-Old British Child Prodigy Being Compared to Picasso - Video My artwork was too, but not in a good way. The comparisons stopped when I learned to put both eyes on the front of the head.
2 posted on
12/15/2009 7:18:23 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Obamalaise - the new mood for America.)
To: Federalist Patriot
Wow! He’s the real deal. Gorgeous work.
3 posted on
12/15/2009 7:18:29 AM PST by
fullchroma
(Obama: GET OUT OF MY DOCTOR'S OFFICE!)
To: Federalist Patriot
4 posted on
12/15/2009 7:19:34 AM PST by
thecabal
(Destroy Progressivism)
To: Federalist Patriot
His stuff is way better than Picasso’s!
5 posted on
12/15/2009 7:20:32 AM PST by
pepsi_junkie
(Who is John Galt?)
To: Federalist Patriot
a young painter being compared to PicassoSo he doesn't bathe and beats up women?
6 posted on
12/15/2009 7:22:39 AM PST by
Tijeras_Slim
(Live jubtabulously!)
To: Federalist Patriot
For a seven year old, his perspective and color use is excellent. Picasso might not be the best comparison, as he’s much more of a traditional painter. I doubt any of the Wyeth’s were much better at age seven.
9 posted on
12/15/2009 7:24:57 AM PST by
Richard Kimball
(We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
To: Federalist Patriot
Picasso created sh!t and he’d be the first to tell you it was sh!t. It was NOT art.
10 posted on
12/15/2009 7:25:42 AM PST by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: Federalist Patriot
Blows nose in napkin...signs and hands it to waiter. I’m Picasso!
(warning: obscure SNL reference)
11 posted on
12/15/2009 7:27:36 AM PST by
Rinnwald
To: Federalist Patriot
Not Picasso!
This kid’s paintings are discernable and relate to real world images.
Not a bunch of abstract crap....
12 posted on
12/15/2009 7:29:12 AM PST by
G Larry
(DNC is comprised of REGRESSIVES!)
To: Federalist Patriot
I think Pisarro would be a better point of comparison for this child’s work.
13 posted on
12/15/2009 7:32:59 AM PST by
La Lydia
To: Federalist Patriot
He has an amazing eye and an even more amazing hand. It would be good to let him develop without offering him formal training, letting him teach himself, until he is secure in his own skill and style that no instructor could alter his style.
On the other hand, you can’t assume that because someone has great skill at an early age that this is their baseline and they’re going to continue to improve and grow forever, as Mozart did. I know artists who seemed to be prodigies at an early age, and they got a little better through the years but never turned into magnificent artists; they just had all the wiring in place early but didn’t build on it. Developing a young talent like this is a delicate process.
14 posted on
12/15/2009 7:33:55 AM PST by
ottbmare
(I could agree wth you, but then we'd both be wrong.)
To: Federalist Patriot
Let’s see what he’s doing 10, 15 or 20 years from now.
16 posted on
12/15/2009 7:36:18 AM PST by
garyhope
(It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam.)
To: Cailleach
20 posted on
12/15/2009 7:48:25 AM PST by
kalee
(01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
To: Federalist Patriot
If I knew this kid was going to be as famous as Picasso, I'd buy a couple of his paintings at $1,000 each and insure my Grand-kids college education.
sw
21 posted on
12/15/2009 7:53:23 AM PST by
spectre
(Spectre's wife)
To: Federalist Patriot
Well, here’s our next hero, to replace Tiger Woods. He’s way too young to be an adulterer.
22 posted on
12/15/2009 7:53:51 AM PST by
LussaO
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson