Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-22 next  last
To: Daffynition
2 posted on 
11/25/2009 12:33:51 AM PST by 
tophat9000
(Obama plans to fix America like he fixed his dog)
 
To: Daffynition
3 posted on 
11/25/2009 12:39:45 AM PST by 
Berlin_Freeper
(Barney Frank is the most disgusting person I can think of. I been thinking about it for months now.)
 
To: Daffynition
I LOVE reading articles like this, even though I don’t understand a word of it.
5 posted on 
11/25/2009 12:43:19 AM PST by 
Bullish
 
To: Daffynition
6 posted on 
11/25/2009 12:52:05 AM PST by 
woofie
 
To: Daffynition
But does it explain why the climate models don’t predict global cooling?
8 posted on 
11/25/2009 1:07:31 AM PST by 
dila813
 
To: Daffynition
I am reading this and honestly am thinking this is too simple, I can’t believe they overlooked this before.
It seems an obvious thing to test.
Maybe the problem was, group think prevented someone from presenting it because they were afraid of retribution from other scientists?
9 posted on 
11/25/2009 1:15:46 AM PST by 
dila813
 
To: Daffynition
25 posted on 
11/25/2009 3:25:07 AM PST by 
Skooz
(Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
 
To: Daffynition
31 posted on 
11/25/2009 4:01:28 AM PST by 
4Speed
 
To: Daffynition
I wonder what these guys talk about when they get together on Super Bowl Sunday?
To: Daffynition
Along with Sergei M. Sibiryakov, also at EPFL, and Oriol Pujolas of CERN near Geneva, Blas has reformulated Hořava gravity to bring it back into line with general relativity. Sibiryakov presented the groups model in September at a meeting in Talloires, France.
 
 Sounds like Michael Mann and his bunch's approach.
 
 Gia Dvali, a quantum gravity expert at CERN, remains cautious. A few years ago he tried a similar trick, breaking apart space and time in an attempt to explain dark energy. But he abandoned his model because it allowed information to be communicated faster than the speed of light.
  
 My intuition is that any such models will have unwanted side effects, Dvali thinks. But if they find a version that doesnt, then that theory must be taken very seriously.
 
 Oh, geez. Let's make sure that it doesn't result in telling us something that we don't want to know or believe or is different from what we expected, like experimental results that demonstrate the speed of gravity is many times that the speed of light.
36 posted on 
11/25/2009 4:23:12 AM PST by 
aruanan
 
To: Daffynition
The picture is exactly correct. Time is a human perception and has been assigned a value by humans. Consequently time is an imperfect tool to use to try and understand space. While time does reflect a measure of change the universe may not care about our efforts to assign it a value that may or may not be relevant to understanding space. Einstein seemed to be obsessed with time and therefore his projections are probably skewed.
44 posted on 
11/25/2009 5:15:17 AM PST by 
mad_as_he$$
(Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy, and ideas are bulletproof.  V for victory)
 
To: Daffynition; dila813
>>>paper published in the August Physical Review D, then the universe didnt bangit bounced. A universe filled with matter will contract down to a smallbut finitesize and then bounce out again
About five years ago there was a calculation discussed that suggested the temperature of the “universe” would make sense only if there had been a series of prior “big bangs”. By their arithmetic, something like five prior progressively cooling universes would be required to form the current state of physics.
Maybe they were on the right track.
47 posted on 
11/25/2009 5:22:16 AM PST by 
tlb
 
To: Daffynition
To: Daffynition
But now Petr Hořava, a physicist at the University of California, Berkeley, thinks he understands the problem. Its all, he says, a matter of time.
 It's About Time!
To: Daffynition
Still trying after all these years to understand the secrets of the Universe.
To: Daffynition
To: StringTheory
54 posted on 
11/25/2009 3:42:16 PM PST by 
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
 
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
55 posted on 
11/25/2009 3:43:44 PM PST by 
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
 
To: Daffynition
Reminds me of the good olde days of Scientific American.
61 posted on 
11/25/2009 5:33:25 PM PST by 
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
 
To: Daffynition
If his mother would have had an abortion he would have been a canceled Czech.
66 posted on 
11/29/2009 12:55:52 PM PST by 
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-22 next  last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson