[Swordmaker]

Here are the links to the original reports by Professor Luigi Garlaschelli:

http://sites.google.com/site/luigigarlaschelli/

http://sites.google.com/site/luigigarlaschelli/shroudreproduction"

Note that some of these articles require Microsoft Word and are in italian.

Here are some of the images referred to in the article above:

[Swordmaker]

A critical article on last months supposed proof that the Shroud of Turin is a forgery made in the medieval period with medieval materials. PING!

If you want on or off the Shroud of Turin Ping List, Freepmail me.

[Bob Eimiller]

Bump

[Young Werther]

Which came first, the Shroud or the Veronica Veil?

I thought that when the computer images are compared their is a degree of details that could not be done "by hand".

Luigi is dancing in the dark!

[maine-iac7]

These people are so pathetic.

What contortions they go through - idiotic.

[Coleus]

.

[SuziQ]

I hope, at some point, that the Bishop of Turin, along with the Vatican, will allow samples to be taken from closer to the center of the Shroud, so that Carbon dating can be done on them. It is well known that there were repairs done on the Shroud during the Middle Ages, which likely accounts for the time frame given for the samples on which the dating was done several years ago.

If those samples are dated to the first century A.D. it would render moot all this other speculation.