[Swordmaker]

Barrie Schworz responds to the claim the Shroud of Turin was successfully duplicated by an Italian professor of chemistry at the University of Pavia (Italy) PING!

Also included is commentary on the "duplication" by Shroud research Petrus Soons, M.D., who dismantles the Italian Professor's claims.

If you want on or off the Shroud of Turin Ping List, Freepmail me.

[Freedom'sWorthIt]

Thank you for this post.

Excellent facts and some I did not remember.

So much for the Italian “scientist” and his atheist sponsors.

[Pamlico]

What is neat about Barrie Schwortz is that he is Jewish and that he will absolutely defend the Shroud as not a fake.

[JoeProBono]

Ebay

[Cloverfarm]

H’mmm ...

Interesting

[WVNan]

Thanks for this SM. I’ve been waiting for the rebuttal. It’s a good one. I wish people would really know what they are talking about when they offer opinions about the Shroud. It’s like me offering an opinion on Calculus even though I have no idea what it is except it deals with math and I hate math.

[csense]

I like Barrie Schwortz. I read many of his debates on the internet years ago with another scientist whose name eludes me. It's good to read his material again.

As soon as I heard about this new reproduction, and that it was based on red ochre, I knew it was nonsense for the very reasons that Schwortz outlines in this article. Anyone who follows this issue seriously knows that the image is not based on this substance.

[aruanan]

Still here, I see.