Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers
But the actual Shroud itself, has been available for scientific study from a variety of disciplines. All concurring lines of reproducible evidence are consistent with its being genuine.

I disagree with that. I am pretty sure the last scientific study of the shroud pinned its age to the Middle Ages.

23 posted on 10/08/2009 12:18:22 PM PDT by Nikas777 (En touto nika, "In this, be victorious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Nikas777
Snerk.

If you are referring to the radiocarbon testing, the samples were taken all from one area of the Shroud; in violation of pre-agreed-upon protocols.

The funny thing is, when you look at the raw data for the dates assigned to the samples taken, they don't match. Furthermore, the area from which these samples were taken have been shown to be comprised of different material, with a different weave, from the rest of the Shroud.

Homogeneity of the sample is vital in analytic chemistry.

Cheers!

28 posted on 10/08/2009 12:24:11 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Nikas777

No. It did not. It dated a patch on the shroud that was made in the middle ages.


49 posted on 10/08/2009 5:29:14 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (di tray hoi den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson