Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Nikas777
Snerk.

If you are referring to the radiocarbon testing, the samples were taken all from one area of the Shroud; in violation of pre-agreed-upon protocols.

The funny thing is, when you look at the raw data for the dates assigned to the samples taken, they don't match. Furthermore, the area from which these samples were taken have been shown to be comprised of different material, with a different weave, from the rest of the Shroud.

Homogeneity of the sample is vital in analytic chemistry.

Cheers!

28 posted on 10/08/2009 12:24:11 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

I am pretty sure it was more than radio carbon dating. It is not like they were close and the vote was 3 for and 4 against.


30 posted on 10/08/2009 12:32:49 PM PDT by Nikas777 (En touto nika, "In this, be victorious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson