[Texas Eagle]

[GeronL]

It will take a long time to study these things and to determine what they mean.

[smokingfrog]

Wasn't one of those "bird dinosaurs" proved to be a fake?

[driftdiver]

So the new evidence perfectly matches their pre-determined conclusions. This musta been funded by a govt grant.

[antiRepublicrat]

Another Chinese hoax, wishful thinking, or the real thing? Time will tell.

[calex59]

Are these the same Chinese that faked the other bird/dino fossils?

[SunkenCiv]

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·
	Gods Graves Glyphs	To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society · · Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·

[LiteKeeper]

INTREP

[LiteKeeper]

I guess it doesn’t matter that the pulmonary systems of mammals and birds are incompatible. Mammals breathe in and out, birds breath straight through. Oh well...details!

[parsifal]

Just read this on another thread with the opposite conclusions. Would comment but it would just start a fight with the other guys.

parsy, who wonders

[CharlesWayneCT]

So, finding feathered dinosaurs that pre-date the non-feathered dinosaurs is somehow seen as supporting the “theory” that animals evolved from scales to feathers.

Fortunately, being the story of evolution, and not the actual theory of evolution, we can just re-write the history so that feathers came first, and everything’s good.