Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: decimon

If this is case, what about the Inuit in Alaska? Should they not have evolved into light-skinned blonds as well?


6 posted on 08/30/2009 10:47:10 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: La Lydia

They’re not agrarian.


9 posted on 08/30/2009 10:48:38 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: La Lydia
If this is case, what about the Inuit in Alaska? Should they not have evolved into light-skinned blonds as well?

If they turned to agriculture. Don't think they did.

10 posted on 08/30/2009 10:49:47 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: La Lydia
If this is case, what about the Inuit in Alaska? Should they not have evolved into light-skinned blonds as well?

No, because they were never farmers, but remained primaryily hunters. Lots of vit D in animal flesh. ( According to the theory)

I remember seeing a food channel episode a while beack where the host ate a seal with an Inuit family. One delicacy- the eyeballs- incredibly rich in vit D.

13 posted on 08/30/2009 10:50:51 AM PDT by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: La Lydia
If this is case, what about the Inuit in Alaska? Should they not have evolved into light-skinned blonds as well?

Good one!

23 posted on 08/30/2009 10:58:55 AM PDT by GOPJ (Socialism : Envy gussied up as a political cause...... David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: La Lydia
"If this is case, what about the Inuit in Alaska? Should they not have evolved into light-skinned blonds as well?"

Perhaps the Inuit evolved into cheerleaders?



(This is all such nonsense. They get closer & closer to the timescales the Bible talks about, never once considering the connection.)
52 posted on 08/30/2009 11:40:43 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out (click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: La Lydia

Fatty fish is one of the few food sources for vitamin D. I suppose the Inuits don’t need as much vitamin D from sunlight.


86 posted on 08/30/2009 12:28:27 PM PDT by LiberConservative (OneBigAssMistakeAmerica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: La Lydia

Perhaps they are currently undergoing that process


88 posted on 08/30/2009 12:32:43 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . fasl el-khitab)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: La Lydia

no, the Inuit get vitamin D from fish oil.

But even in Asia, northern Asians have lighter skin than those in the south...the Ainu of Japan for example. But the skin of the Chinese and Japanese is fairer than that of Malaysia or the Philippines...

It wouldn’t take too long to evolve. IF you lack vitamin D, you are more prone to ricketts....and women with even mild ricketts have deformed pelvises and can’t deliver babies normally...ergo, blond scandanavians and Slavs, but darker Italians. Celts somewhere in between.


125 posted on 08/30/2009 10:37:16 PM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: La Lydia
Neah. This EXPLAINS why they aren't pale. Their diet is mostly carnivorous - so they get their vitamin D from meat, especially organ meat.
130 posted on 08/31/2009 5:20:16 AM PDT by Little Ray (Obama is a kamikaze president aimed at the heart of this Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson