Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Obama's father was a Kenyan then how could Hussein be eligible to be POTUS?
8/26/2009 | Kellynla

Posted on 08/26/2009 12:40:24 PM PDT by kellynla

If Obama's father was a Kenyan then how could Hussein be eligible to be POTUS?


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Reference
KEYWORDS: article2section; bc; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; kenyan; obama; obamafamily; potus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-344 next last
To: Non-Sequitur
hey, I just asked a question

if you're looking for an argument go elsewhere...

shezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

61 posted on 08/26/2009 1:18:24 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

KellynLA

Try this link:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/craig-v-us-10th-circuit-court-of-appeals-held-08-05-2009-14th-amendment-native-born-citizens-have-no-constitutional-right-to-natural-born-citizen-status/

A good source of info. Mothers citizenship in this case DOES NOT transfer citizenship to O’bone-head. The laws in place in Hawaii mandated she had to have reached the age of majority & lived in the state for 5 years. She could not qualify in either case.


62 posted on 08/26/2009 1:19:50 PM PDT by Fighter@heart (Government, the most inefficient entity to ever exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

According to Mr. Collins’ article, people born in the U.S. who’s father is not a U.S. citizen are not a citizen of any kind, much less a natural-born citizen. That position was repudiated by the Supreme Court in the Ark decision.


63 posted on 08/26/2009 1:20:26 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

I suppose that you could argue that cesarean born is not natural born or that an artificial insemination or in-vitro baby would not be “natural”.

[/trying to be funny]


64 posted on 08/26/2009 1:20:59 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Of course you would be wrong.
65 posted on 08/26/2009 1:22:48 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit The law will be followed, dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GizmosAndGadgets

Presumably all of our citizenships rely on law. Otherwise how do we know what it takes?


66 posted on 08/26/2009 1:23:18 PM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GizmosAndGadgets
If your citizenship status relies on a law, statute, or even a Consitutional Amendment, it's not "natural"

Then how do we know what a natural-born citizen is? What do we base it on?

67 posted on 08/26/2009 1:23:49 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
"Take it up with Chief Justice Roberts. He was the one who administered the Oath of Office to Obama knowing full well his parentage."

And exactly how did Justice Roberts know full well Obama's place of birth? What was he privy to that the rest of the nation wasn't? Anyway, it isn't the Supreme Court's job to be a complainent about anyone's "natural born citizenship". It is their job to either accept and rule on, or deny the appeal if it becomes an issue that reaches their Court through the appeals process.

68 posted on 08/26/2009 1:24:35 PM PDT by jiminycricket000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fighter@heart

okay, thanks


69 posted on 08/26/2009 1:25:28 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Anyone who argues that the plaintiffs here haven’t proven their case is as badly in error as those who are convinced that he is ineligible.
Both you Obots and birthers are arguing from ignorance—a formal logical fallacy.
The question framed might be, how could this dispute be resolved? And I think the answer is self evident.
In any event, if Barry doesn’t cough it up I’ll spell anyone riding him into the ground because my good friend Quasimodo told me he had a hunch that 0’s lying.


70 posted on 08/26/2009 1:25:44 PM PDT by tumblindice ( How long? Until the last dog dies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Fighter@heart
Mothers citizenship in this case DOES NOT transfer citizenship to O’bone-head.

The Constitution states that if you're born in the USA you're a citizen. It doesn't get any more "natural" than that, and has nothing to do with parental citizenship.

The laws in place in Hawaii mandated

The laws in place in Hawaii do not override the Constitution, which states "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States". You're born here, you're a citizen - PERIOD.

71 posted on 08/26/2009 1:28:04 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (flag@whitehouse.gov may bounce messages but copies may be kept. Informants are still solicited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
hey, I just asked a question

As am I. Where did your understanding of that requirement come from?

72 posted on 08/26/2009 1:28:18 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Interesting stuff. Thanks for posting. I look forward to reading the final report. From the research:

to be a natural born citizen one must be born on the soil of parents who were themselves citizens

73 posted on 08/26/2009 1:30:15 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

“If Obama’s father was a Kenyan then how could Hussein be eligible to be POTUS?”

I’m not sure it matters, some of our earlier presidents were born to parents who weren’t Americans, because the United States of America did not yet exist, so it seems to me that natural born citizenship is dependent on birth in the United States and not on the citizenship of the parents. For instance, Andrew Jackson’s parents immigrated from Northern Ireland in 1765, and in 1767, his father (Andrew Jackson Sr.) died 3 weeks before Andrew was born in South Carolina. I don’t know if Jackson’s father was officially a citizen yet of the colony of South Carolina at the time of his death, but would it even matter?


74 posted on 08/26/2009 1:31:53 PM PDT by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

As I understand all but Chester Arthur’s father. And that was hidden until Chester left office.

I think the argument can be made that having one parent, usually the father, as a citizen of another country imparts the child dual citizenship and the question arises as to allegiance.


75 posted on 08/26/2009 1:32:28 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

The Constitution doesn’t say that. It says nothing of parental requirements upon citizenship of a child born here.


76 posted on 08/26/2009 1:33:30 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (flag@whitehouse.gov may bounce messages but copies may be kept. Informants are still solicited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Can anyone say “retarded” today...especially today when the Liar of the Senate died?


77 posted on 08/26/2009 1:34:36 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Well then my status is in doubt! I wuz hatched. :-)


78 posted on 08/26/2009 1:34:46 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (flag@whitehouse.gov may bounce messages but copies may be kept. Informants are still solicited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
I think the argument can be made that having one parent, usually the father, as a citizen of another country imparts the child dual citizenship and the question arises as to allegiance.

Why should an accident of birth cause questions of allegiance? Chester Arthur was born, lived his whole life, and died in the U.S. Why should we believe that he had any allegiance to a country he never lived in? Should we deny Jews the right to run for the presidency by assuming that they have an allegiance to Israel as well as the U.S.?

79 posted on 08/26/2009 1:36:44 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
Of course you would be wrong.

Doesn't appear so. Last time I checked, Obama was President.

80 posted on 08/26/2009 1:37:01 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-344 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson