1 posted on
07/03/2009 5:39:17 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
2 posted on
07/03/2009 5:40:03 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: SunkenCiv
The findings suggest that death in young children was so common that community members were unlikely to revere the death of their offspring until they had survived for more than five years.
Nixon's Fault!
John Kerry said so.
3 posted on
07/03/2009 5:42:57 AM PDT by
Condor51
(The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
To: SunkenCiv
4 posted on
07/03/2009 5:52:37 AM PDT by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus)
To: SunkenCiv
The idea that babies weren't highly thought of is a ridiculous conclusion BECAUSE of the necessary nurturing in the first years. Yup...two male archaelogists....
We find the same situation with the deaths of babies and older children today...Nothing has changed....
To: SunkenCiv
6 posted on
07/03/2009 6:44:41 AM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet)
To: SunkenCiv
death in young children was so common If only they'd had Obamacare.
8 posted on
07/06/2009 12:31:02 PM PDT by
colorado tanker
("Lastly, I'd like to apologize for America's disproportionate response to Pearl Harbor . . . ")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
