1 posted on
05/25/2009 1:29:44 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
2 posted on
05/25/2009 1:30:07 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
Biocentrism site:freerepublic.com
Google
3 posted on
05/25/2009 1:30:38 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: KevinDavis; annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
4 posted on
05/25/2009 1:30:51 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
5 posted on
05/25/2009 1:31:10 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
6 posted on
05/25/2009 1:31:37 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: SunkenCiv
For centuries, scientists regarded Berkeley's argument as a philosophical sideshow
And will continue to do so for centuries to come. Its like saying that the moon doesn't exist unless a man has his feet on it.
7 posted on
05/25/2009 1:36:10 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: SunkenCiv
When someone watches a subatomic particle or a bit of light pass through the slits, the particle behaves like a bullet, passing through one hole or the other. But if no one observes the particle, it exhibits the behavior of a wave that can inhabit all possibilities -- including somehow passing through both holes at the same time. I wouldn't trust any particle that does things in private that it wouldn't do in public!
8 posted on
05/25/2009 1:50:25 PM PDT by
Ken H
To: SunkenCiv
Just another way to try & say “man is god”. Goes back to Gen 3:5.
To: SunkenCiv
I would guess biocentrism, like many theories concocted by man, will bring more questions than answers.
And biocentrism would not be the first erroneous theory attempting to establish the logically impossible idea that creation is also creator.
10 posted on
05/25/2009 1:53:49 PM PDT by
reasonisfaith
(Liberals have neither the creativity nor the confidence to understand the truth of conservatism)
To: SunkenCiv
11 posted on
05/25/2009 2:05:57 PM PDT by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: SunkenCiv
Gadfry, but it’s a hoot watching scientists discover philosophy and theology in middle age.
Since they never had Intro to Philosophy, they always end up recreating some ancient error.
15 posted on
05/25/2009 3:04:46 PM PDT by
dsc
(A man with an experience is never at the mercy of a man with an argument.)
To: SunkenCiv
So, it's as I've always suspected.
Nothing exists until I open my eyes in the morning.
;-)
18 posted on
05/25/2009 6:22:28 PM PDT by
IYellAtMyTV
(Workday Forecast--Increasing pressure towards afternoon. Rum likely by evening.)
22 posted on
05/31/2009 9:33:24 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
23 posted on
05/31/2009 9:36:17 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson