Skip to comments.
Why Is Free Republic Allowing Liberal Trolls To Stay?
May 12 2009
| jveritas
Posted on 05/12/2009 12:07:37 PM PDT by jveritas
There are some really annoying liberal trolls on Free Republic who have survived for months and years without being banned. Why is Free Republic allowing them to stay? We have enough liberalism and left wing lunacy on 90% of the media and we do not need this crap on this forum.
It is not difficult to spot these trolls. A quick review of their posting history will prove without any shadow of doubt that they are liberal trolls. Some of them try to mask it but they cannot fool the vast majority of us.
There are plenty of left wing forums which will welcome them that if they are not already registered and active members there.
It is time to get rid of them.
Hit the abuse bottom on them and hit it often.
TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister; Free Republic Policy/Q&A
KEYWORDS: definitionoftroll; faq; howtotroll; trolling; trolling101; trolls; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 721-735 next last
To: Smokin' Joe
The obvious question is "Why?". LOL! People who tell Jim Robinson how he "has to" run the site crack me up. Presumably the answer to "Why?" is "Or I (Poster X) will leave," ... to which the general populace responds, "What, you were here?"
621
posted on
05/13/2009 1:33:40 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("Leave the presence of a fool, for there you do not meet words of knowledge."~Pr. 14:7)
To: wagglebee
Bill has a paper on the “The Scarlet Pimpernel” due, so I’m practicing my English-teacher-talk.
622
posted on
05/13/2009 1:34:32 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("Leave the presence of a fool, for there you do not meet words of knowledge."~Pr. 14:7)
To: Birch T. Barlow
The attitudes and behaviors associated with Christ are love, humility, compassion, patience, kindness, selflessness, being a good servant-leader. Wagglebee has exhibited none of these on this forum. In fact, as soon as he gets a post that may challenge him the first thing he does is ping his list. If Wagglebee is the one you have chosen to follow at his beck and call, look a little higher source for guidance. Wagglebee is a respected FReeper with many friends. Who are you, n00b? What was your previous screen name?
To: Tax-chick
Is there actually any historical proof that the English aristocracy had any affinity for the French aristocracy?
624
posted on
05/13/2009 1:38:50 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
The Plantagenets, but that predates the French Revolution by quite a few centuries. Bill thinks the French lady is a twit.
625
posted on
05/13/2009 1:42:10 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("Leave the presence of a fool, for there you do not meet words of knowledge."~Pr. 14:7)
To: betty boop; wagglebee; Birch T. Barlow; Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; metmom; BykrBayb; ...
At the same time, this writer is evidently holding himself out as "a better Christian" than you are wagglebee; for he faults you for your lack of Christlike behavior, and gives you a detailed list of what that requires. The irony in those situations (and they happen regularly) is that in their zeal to label and condemn others as being *unChrist-like* and *unloving*, those who hold themselves out as "a better Christian" than others & faults others for their lack of Christlike behavior, exhibit the EXACT behavior they are accusing others of.
If they think people are not going to see that, they must be stupider than they think everyone else is.
626
posted on
05/13/2009 1:44:42 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Tax-chick
The Plantagenets wanted to rule both England and France (and fought the Hundred Years War to try to accomplish this), so it hardly counts. I hated “The Scarlet Pimpernel”, “Scaramouche” was a much better book.
627
posted on
05/13/2009 1:46:43 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: jeffc
Remember the ASH ALERT anyone?
Sure do.....and A+bert also.
To: metmom
629
posted on
05/13/2009 1:47:21 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(Fight the bastards or perish! ~ Jim Robinson ~ Þ)
To: jveritas
It’s hard not to be called a troll on FR these days.
630
posted on
05/13/2009 1:48:59 PM PDT
by
Cinnamon Girl
(G-d Bless President Bush. He kept us safe.)
To: wagglebee
My point was that there was a time - several hundred years from the Norman Conquest on - when the English and French nobility were the same people.
I agree with you about the books. I think it’s because “Scaramouche” was written by a man, and men generally produce better adventure novels. Women writers want you to like the characters, especially the heroine, too much.
631
posted on
05/13/2009 1:49:08 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("Leave the presence of a fool, for there you do not meet words of knowledge."~Pr. 14:7)
To: Tax-chick
So if we become onehunnert purcent series, does that mean the mods would have to zot their opus, too?
632
posted on
05/13/2009 1:49:14 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: wagglebee
That’s too bad, because I was going to give you an A+.
633
posted on
05/13/2009 1:49:23 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(Fight the bastards or perish! ~ Jim Robinson ~ Þ)
To: metmom
Here, I fixed it for you:
The irony in those situations (and they happen regularly) is that in their zeal to label and condemn others as being *unChrist-like* and *unloving*, those who hold themselves out as "a better Christian" than others & faults others for their lack of Christlike behavior, exhibit the EXACT behavior they are accusing others of are generally hateful atheists.
634
posted on
05/13/2009 1:50:14 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Tax-chick
My point was that there was a time - several hundred years from the Norman Conquest on - when the English and French nobility were the same people. Yeah, I was just giving you a hard time.
635
posted on
05/13/2009 1:52:11 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
I’ve noticed that, too.
Comes from all that experience on the crevo threads.
636
posted on
05/13/2009 1:56:29 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: wagglebee
Maybe *bitter, cynical atheists* would work better?
637
posted on
05/13/2009 1:57:07 PM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Smokin' Joe
We could try it and see what happens ... but do we really want to hang out with epople who are always series? Booo-ring.
638
posted on
05/13/2009 2:21:20 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("Leave the presence of a fool, for there you do not meet words of knowledge."~Pr. 14:7)
To: wagglebee
639
posted on
05/13/2009 2:22:03 PM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Quix
640
posted on
05/13/2009 2:24:36 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 721-735 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson