Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Passed my EXTRA CLASS Ham Radio exam tonight (vanity)
ARRL/VEC ^ | 4-8-2009 | Me

Posted on 04/09/2009 12:44:48 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly

I have been a licenced Ham operator since 1978. I have had a Technician Class license since 1982 - this was back in the days when you had to go to an FCC office to take the tests, which at the time for me was about 200 miles from home.

Since US Ham Rado went No Code in 2007, I have been qualified to upgrade to General Class by simply going to a test session and filling out some paperwork. The reason for the "free" upgrade is the exam elements I passed back in '82 are the same as for the General Class today.

So, tonight there was a test session in town and I went in to get my grandfathered upgrade. While there the examiners suggested successful applicants (which I would be by default) could move on and test for successive upgrades without extra cost or penalty beyond time spent so I said what the heck. I had within the past month browsed the question pool (a public record by law) and already figured there's no way I could pass this right now, but nothing ventured nothing gained they say.

And the test was hard. It had a few gimmes, a surprizing number of questions covering advanced theory that related to things I'd specialized in and even pioneered in years past, a lot of stuff I sort of knew but not in depth, and the remainder, about equal to the margin between acing and passing, that I knew little about at all. But going through it I became more encouraged as I went along, and in the end I passed with exactly the minimum required number of correct answers, and as one of the examiners said, it doesn't matter whether you aced it or barely passed, it isn't posted on the wallpaper and you don't have to sign with your score in the EXTRA CLASS sub bands.

And I am so jazzed, and for more on WHY I am so jazzed, read the comment body. The link above goes to nothing specific but there you can discover how to join the fraternity yourself. I am glad to have returned, and anxious to see what's new.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Computers/Internet; Hobbies; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: hamradio; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last
To: dragnet2
Try communicating to the other side of the planet without a phone line/cable while off the grid, on 10 watts, completely independent of any software or supporting elements, for free.

For less than the cost of that 10 watt transceiver, I can buy two Magic Jacks and communicate with people I have some reason to want to communicate with (privately even) for practically nothing. I can run the thing on auxiliary power too if I want.

Again I am not bashing ham radio, but in anything short of a total global meltdown, email, VOIP, or even POTS are much more efficient and useful ways to communicate worldwide. Besides with ham radio you have no privacy and cannot carry on business over the air.

Ham radio is great, but it's mainly a hobby and not a practical means of carrying on essential communication. In certain dire emergencies, it can be much more and I fully support keeping hams around.

101 posted on 04/11/2009 2:21:28 PM PDT by cerberus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: cerberus
Personally, the internet has diminished my interest in ham radio.

Try communicating to the other side of the planet without a phone line/cable while off the grid, on 10 watts, completely independent of any software or supporting elements, for free.

For less than the cost of that 10 watt transceiver, I can buy two Magic Jacks and communicate with people I have some reason to want to communicate with

Uh...Magic Jacks?

Don't you have to plug those into a telephone line, and need a computer to operate?

102 posted on 04/11/2009 2:45:00 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: cerberus
VOIP, or even POTS are much more efficient and useful ways to communicate worldwide

BTW, speaking of communicating, if you'd read back, my position wasn't about efficiency, it was was simplicity, free communications, being off the grid, and using extremely low power.

Of course, you can spend lots of money per month hooked up to the web, VOIP, and hundreds of others schemes to take your money on monthly installment plans...

But that's not what I'm talking about.

103 posted on 04/11/2009 2:50:19 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: All

Found the Kaito 1102 on sale today for 59.99

http://www.jr.com/product/productListing.jsp?Ntt=kaito+1102

Just ordered one.

Also, my Ten Tec RX320D had the front end blown out in a bad storm this AM while I was asleep :(


104 posted on 04/12/2009 4:46:29 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Clinging Bitterly

Remember when we had to draw diagrams of circuits to pass the exams? I hold an advanced class and will never upgrade to Extra because Advanced is no longer offered and it is a unique license to hold because of that. KI6JH.


105 posted on 04/12/2009 8:24:49 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
In other words is the test related to the actual needs to operate the equipment as it exists today? Why have a test at all? Is the test designed to be deliberately difficult as a means of apportioning out a limited number of band spots? if so, is that the way the government should do it? Should it be by lottery? Should it be auctioned? Should be granted only according to a public service? Should be withheld from conservatives?

To answer some of your questions, although I am not the guy you posted it too!:) The test are on digital electronics, the code requirements have been reduced for most grades and eliminated on others. The reason you must pass tests is because hams are supposed to be able to work on their own equipment and therefore must be able to keep interference down on the bands and not splatter across the bands and to avoid being on the wrong bands. This is an amateur license and thus is not subject to, and never should be, drawing by lottery, depending on service needs or any other idiotic reason, politics certainly don't enter into it. Your last question was especially on the stupid side, unless of course you were being sarcastic.

106 posted on 04/12/2009 8:31:33 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Later


107 posted on 04/12/2009 8:46:48 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: calex59

unless of course you were being sarcastic.


108 posted on 04/13/2009 12:43:30 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

I wasn’t being sarcastic, it is customary to put a Sar tag on the end of a sentence or comment when you mean sarcasm because it is not possible to tell speech inflections when reading type. In the future you might want to do that.


109 posted on 04/13/2009 1:17:41 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: calex59
No, I regard sarcasm and irony to be valuable tools of writing which should not be diluted by condescending signals to the reader about how to interpret what he sees.

I have never used sarcasm tags and cannot consider that I will do so. I want the reader to have an investment too in making the communication effective.

Thank you for being answering many of my questions about ham radio. What I am trying to find out is whether access to a national asset, which is by its very nature limited and not available to everyone who might like it, is allocated reasonably. I now understand the necessity that people be trained so they don't interfere with other bandwidth allocations. But does that mean that the right to broadcast is allocated reasonably? What is the standard? Can anyone who can pass the test gets such a privilege?


110 posted on 04/13/2009 1:30:51 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: cerberus
True it's a hobby, and some folks take it more seriously than others. And it's not for everybody.

But it is used to provide communication in situations that fall well short of total global meltdown.

111 posted on 04/13/2009 7:47:15 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (I hope he fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: mylife
...RX320D had the front end blown out...

Ouch. For the heck of it I checked the schematic for a lamp fuse or something easy, didn't see it. But likely fixable unless a near direct hit.

We're not in an area that has so much of that but still must take precautions. Our group's repeater site suffered a strike some years ago that took out pretty much everything in the building. We had the usual arresting gear installed but nothing will protect from a direct or near direct hit. It was tough because we built that site from the bare ground, including a lot of the electronic gear in the building.

Our damage was about 50 grand and I think between our tenants they may have had a bit more. But everyone was insured, so for us just a matter of long weekends and late nights to rebuild. Got hit again the next year but it wasn't a scrap everything & start over scenario like the big one.

112 posted on 04/13/2009 8:39:42 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (I hope he fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

Comment #113 Removed by Moderator

To: calex59

Knock off the profanity and personal attacks, please.


114 posted on 04/13/2009 9:20:27 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calex59
Remember when we had to draw diagrams of circuits to pass the exams...?

That was a bit before my time. In 1982 I still had to go to the FCC to take the test but it was all multiple choice.

Having Technician Class prior to the 1987 divergence (when it was automatically changed to "Technician Plus" I carried the element 3 credit of a General. But the next two phases of restructuring where they first eased the Morse requirement and then eliminated it entirely, the license class reverted to Technician, which reflected a knowledge level somewhat lower than I had actually achieved. So in essence, I was downgraded in status at least. I'm not sure why they did it that way but perhaps it was difficult for them to mine the database of Tech Plus holders and divide them according to how they achieved it (whether or not they had passed element 3). So I had to go to a VE session to be made whole, while you still carry the status and privileges you had before.

But I'm happy with the outcome in my case.

115 posted on 04/13/2009 10:03:09 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (I hope he fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Surely you know of sources other than this forum wherein you may find answers to your several questions. If one didn't have reason to believe otherwise they might think you a troll. Read:

http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/cfr/1998/47cfr97.pdf

Meanwhile,


You know what's in the cup. Drink.

116 posted on 04/13/2009 10:25:32 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (I hope he fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Clinging Bitterly
This is a political forum not a ham radio forum. We are not all enthusiasts. You brought up the matter of your obtaining a license and I congratulated you for it. I asked very legitimate political questions on a political forum to which I have not yet received an answer for the most important: upon what basis are licenses allocated and therefore the right to use the public's airwaves?

Why in the hell is it so difficult to get the answer from all you experts? is the allocation process fair? Is there a quota system, if so what is it based on? do the tests relate to a real and practical technical need? Did the Morse code tests when they were used? these are fair political questions which do not by their nature or by the mere fact of posing them denigrate your technical achievement.

Instead of answering these questions every expert who has replied has for the most part simply talked around them. Now you give me your backhand for a troll and serve up a photo of a coffee cup which I can only understand to be some form of condescension. You give me lengthy regulations instead of answers and do not even have the courtesy to cite the relevant paragraphs.

Why do I get the impression that ham radio is some sort of elitist cabal which gets prickly when the public asks you to account for what you all are doing with the public's airwaves?


117 posted on 04/13/2009 10:49:46 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Clinging Bitterly
But it is used to provide communication in situations that fall well short of total global meltdown.

I'll certainly concede that.

118 posted on 04/14/2009 7:19:19 AM PDT by cerberus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson