Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: calex59
No, I regard sarcasm and irony to be valuable tools of writing which should not be diluted by condescending signals to the reader about how to interpret what he sees.

I have never used sarcasm tags and cannot consider that I will do so. I want the reader to have an investment too in making the communication effective.

Thank you for being answering many of my questions about ham radio. What I am trying to find out is whether access to a national asset, which is by its very nature limited and not available to everyone who might like it, is allocated reasonably. I now understand the necessity that people be trained so they don't interfere with other bandwidth allocations. But does that mean that the right to broadcast is allocated reasonably? What is the standard? Can anyone who can pass the test gets such a privilege?


110 posted on 04/13/2009 1:30:51 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford
Surely you know of sources other than this forum wherein you may find answers to your several questions. If one didn't have reason to believe otherwise they might think you a troll. Read:

http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/cfr/1998/47cfr97.pdf

Meanwhile,


You know what's in the cup. Drink.

116 posted on 04/13/2009 10:25:32 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (I hope he fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson