To: ShadowAce
2 posted on
04/01/2009 2:12:02 PM PDT by
nickcarraway
(Are the Good Times Really Over?)
To: nickcarraway
I miss the Indy and the Challenge S that I used to manage. Good hardware but badly run business.
3 posted on
04/01/2009 2:13:36 PM PDT by
pikachu
(Don't be dumb -- we have Democrats for that)
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

I used to work for Linux Networx, which went under and SGI bought most of the remaining assets. Now they're part of Rackable.
5 posted on
04/01/2009 2:19:29 PM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: nickcarraway
Sometimes the jokes write themselves...
7 posted on
04/01/2009 2:21:35 PM PDT by
JRios1968
(The real first rule of Fight Club: Do not invite Chuck Norris...EVER)
To: ourusa; theKid51
8 posted on
04/01/2009 2:21:48 PM PDT by
bmwcyle
(American voters can fix this world if they would just wake up.)
To: nickcarraway
It was good equipment and IRIX was a good O/S. They just spent too much of their profits on crap.
10 posted on
04/01/2009 2:23:48 PM PDT by
bmwcyle
(American voters can fix this world if they would just wake up.)
To: nickcarraway

(That's what we called these boxes when the IT Dept bought them for programmers to draw their designs.)
To: Toddsterpatriot
I learned one of my first rules of investing here: never let a company change its name (from Silicon Graphics to SGI) for no reason pass without completely bailing-out of its stock. :)
It's all good--I only lost 600 dollars.
14 posted on
04/01/2009 2:32:29 PM PDT by
1rudeboy
To: nickcarraway
Moore’s Law killed every mini, super mini and super computer company, and the last one (Sun) is hanging by a thread. All this for Windows Vista?
To: nickcarraway
SGI may still survive, as part of Rackable. It seems to have a couple of very rich, very persistent benefactors:
- Intel, which continues to want to seed the very high end with a few Intel processor based systems, and
- some agencies of the United States government who prefer to go unnamed, but require the worlds largest main memory systems.
The only signficant overlap of existing product or development lines between Rackable and SGI are on the lower end cluster systems. I suspect some SGI cluster engineers are looking over their shoulder and polishing their resumes.
To: nickcarraway
SGI was comprised of 1200 employees as of March 1
When I joined SGI in 1988, it had 1200 employees (or so -- my memory is fuzzy), and most of those ever hired at SGI were still there.
SGI peaked at over 11,000 employees, somewhere in the late 1990's.
When I left SGI last year, it was down to 1800 or so employees. It was an excellent company to work for, especially for high end computer design engineers.
My take is that it's downfall was that it succeeded all too well in the 1990's, attracting greedy upper managers who wanted immediate results and had little long term or consistent understanding of what would be a healthy business model for SGI.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson