Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SGI Sold to Rackable Systems for $25M, Conditionally
TG Daily ^ | Wednesday, April 01, 2009 | Rick C. Hodgin

Posted on 04/01/2009 2:11:49 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Silicon Graphics Inc. (SGI) has reportedly agreed to sell its business to Rackable Systems for $25 million after returning to court today for bankruptcy protection. The sale is conditional upon higher bids offered at auction, and Rackable will also assume a portion of SGI's outstanding debt.

Rackable Systems is server and data-center storage provider that is looking to add SGI's high-performance server systems used in supercomputers to its line of business. The terms of SGI's sale under bankruptcy results in $0.47 per share, which is 15% higher than the stock's closing price on Tuesday.

Rackable Systems is currently facing a financial crisis of its own, having had five consecutive quarterly losses. The purchase is part of CEO Mark Barrenechea's plan to strengthen the company's offerings, by spending 10% of Rackable's cash-on-hand to expand its product offerings as well as sales and service capabilities.

The Wall Street Journal reports on court papers filed by SGI that blame its business difficulties on a bankruptcy filing, and the subsequent challenges it has faced as a result after emerging from bankruptcy in October, 2006.

SGI was comprised of 1200 employees as of March 1, and 14 of its subsidiaries are also in bankruptcy. The company currently has $390.5 million in assets and $526.5 million in debt, some of which Rackable is willing to absorb as part of the hidden purchase price.

As of the most recent Top 500 Supercomputer ranking, SGI held the spot as the vendor with the fifth most systems in the top 500, behind HP, IBM, Cray and Dell. Their highest-performing system includes the #3 supercomputer, Pleiades - SGI Altix ICE 8200EX, Xeon QC 3.0/2.66 GHz (E54xx Harpertowns). The machine contains 51,200 cores, consumes 2 Megawatts and is located at NASA/Ames Research Center/NAS. It delivers a performance of 487 Teraflops max, with 608 Teraflops peak, roughly 44% of the #1 IBM supercomputer, which delivered 1.105 Petaflops, and 46% of the #2 Cray supercomputer, which delivered 1.059 Petaflops.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: cray; sgi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: nickcarraway

Moore’s Law killed every mini, super mini and super computer company, and the last one (Sun) is hanging by a thread. All this for Windows Vista?


21 posted on 04/01/2009 6:38:17 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
SGI may still survive, as part of Rackable. It seems to have a couple of very rich, very persistent benefactors: The only signficant overlap of existing product or development lines between Rackable and SGI are on the lower end cluster systems. I suspect some SGI cluster engineers are looking over their shoulder and polishing their resumes.
22 posted on 04/01/2009 6:41:33 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (Mooo !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Didn't I see a recent rumour that IBM was considering buying Sun?
23 posted on 04/01/2009 6:42:15 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (Mooo !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow

Yep, that was just a couple of days ago, followed by dead silence.


24 posted on 04/01/2009 6:43:26 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
When I joined SGI in 1988, it had 1200 employees (or so -- my memory is fuzzy), and most of those ever hired at SGI were still there.

SGI peaked at over 11,000 employees, somewhere in the late 1990's.

When I left SGI last year, it was down to 1800 or so employees. It was an excellent company to work for, especially for high end computer design engineers.

My take is that it's downfall was that it succeeded all too well in the 1990's, attracting greedy upper managers who wanted immediate results and had little long term or consistent understanding of what would be a healthy business model for SGI.

25 posted on 04/01/2009 6:49:37 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (Mooo !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

I figured Sun was on the way out when they started working on their HQ in the old Agnews Insane Asylum.


26 posted on 04/01/2009 6:56:32 PM PDT by Betis70 (Go UConn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
My take is that it's downfall was that it succeeded all too well in the 1990's, attracting greedy upper managers who wanted immediate results and had little long term or consistent understanding of what would be a healthy business model for SGI.
IOW, management got victory disease, and lost their edge?

27 posted on 04/02/2009 3:24:05 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson