Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/22/2009 9:32:50 PM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

People still use internet explorer? I thought that went the way of netscape.


2 posted on 03/22/2009 9:36:23 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
IE7 only gets a 12, so looks like a big improvement!

http://acid3.acidtests.org/

3 posted on 03/22/2009 9:42:50 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( Dear Mr. Obama - Please make it rain candy! P.S. I like jelly beans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker


I like this one better:


5 posted on 03/22/2009 9:44:24 PM PDT by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

I had a funny feeling this was a post from you. Acid3 isn’t all it’s cracked up to be as far as determining browser efficiency or performance. Since it is evaluating web standards there is a lot of Javascript testing. If the websites you frequent don’t use javascript there will be a skewed rating. Honestly in real world usage the numbers aren’t that different between IE8 and Safari. Hell the newest Safari 3.3.3 or whatever the Windows version is, talk about bloatware. The package is like 104MBs!!!! I though IE8.0 was bloatware and that is at something svelt in comparison at less than 20MB. Worse yet is Apple is slick with the try to trick you into installing iTunes or the Iupdater BS.


6 posted on 03/22/2009 9:49:34 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Well, one thing I have found is that IE8 is a heck of a lot faster than Opera or Firefox. At least the 64bit version - and on Win7 7057.

It's faster enough that I rarely use the others anymore.

7 posted on 03/22/2009 9:51:30 PM PDT by the anti-liberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Microsoft violates standards intentionally as an anti-competitive practice. Making its products as incompatible as possible with others is a way of forcing consumers to remain with Microsoft rather than choosing software on the basis of price and performance.


62 posted on 03/23/2009 1:31:33 AM PDT by tvdog12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

64 posted on 03/23/2009 5:07:39 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

What did previous versions of IE score? But of course in the end it doesn’t matter, IE is the standard, if you’re making a web app that’s going to be in the Windows market you code to IE and might not even test on other browsers. Sure it would be nice if IE followed the standards so you could code to them and have your app probably work on many other browsers, but that’s not good for MS. Own the market and let everybody else be “buggy”, that’s the MS way.


80 posted on 03/23/2009 1:56:48 PM PDT by razorboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson