Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Isabel C.; Quix
I rather imagine that just about everyone knows that lie detector tests, oops, polygraph tests, are inadmissable in court.

However, law enforcement routinely use them as a tool to at least tentatively and temporarily eliminate persons of interest....and these tests are routinely carried out by LE daily across the fruited plain.

Also, just asking the suspect to take a test and get a refusal is also a clue that the police tuck away in their heads.

If polygraph machines were of absolutely no value whatsoever, they would have been long gone as a crime-solving tool and would not even be manufactured because they would not be purchased.

I read the article but forget if this couple is still living and mentally alert. I wonder if they would consent to a test today.

IMHO, their tale is absurd and only mildly interesting.

Leni

91 posted on 02/22/2009 5:41:23 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: MinuteGal

I don’t think you have investigated the Hill case sufficiently to have formed such a dismissive, strong opinion about such a dramatic and important early case.

Otherwise, I think you make good points.


94 posted on 02/22/2009 7:00:49 AM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson